The T-Mobile-Sprint Merger Raises these Important Questions

The T-Mobile-Sprint merger is generating a plethora of headlines. Some think it’s a bad idea. Others believe it will provide certain benefits. Still others don’t see a clear winner. Regardless of where you stand, it does raise a few interesting questions. We all understand what a merger is — the combining of two entities into one. But, there’s a lot more to it than just this simple explanation. The truth is, there are distinct advantages and disadvantages of merging two organizations.

Common Merger Disadvantages

Let’s begin with one of the most obvious pain points — employee morale. The reason two brands come together is to improve their performance. However, this often means the elimination of duplicate roles. And, rank-and-file employees instinctively know this fact. Another downside to merging is that it can create more debt. Teaming up means taking on the balance sheet obligations, which can easily become problematic.

…making changes to your business include the economic and political climate in which you operate. Determine whether tax or trade laws in your region are friendly toward the types of modifications you want to make. You may come to the conclusion that now is a good time to move forward with the desired alterations or you may elect to wait for circumstances to change in your favor. —Bix Fluent.com

Then, there’s another intangible — company cultures. One organization might operate with a completely different dynamic than the other. Which might manifest trouble when the two become one entity. Of course, merging means the essential elimination of the top decision maker. Instead, there are at least a few people on either side of the aisle.

Biggest Merger Advantages

Now, let’s take a look at the upsides of merging. The point of coming together is to improve the performance and ensure a better future for both companies. Here are the top merger advantages:

  • Improved efficiency. We’ve already partially mentioned this but here’s the other side of eliminating redundant positions — increased efficiency. A merger can provide a new environment to improve efficiency on many levels.
  • New territories. When two companies come together, it’s likely that one (or both) parties will benefit from the introduction of new territories. It’s a way to tap into market share without undergoing the growing pains.
  • Cost-effective expansion. Speaking of growing pains, a merge creates an opportunity to expand without all the normal hassles. It allows for the identification of the best assets, which means increased productivity.
  • Multiple growth opportunities. Two previously competing businesses combined as one opens up a number of growth opportunities. Instead of working to beat one another, they now work in unison toward one or more goals.

What other consideration would you factor into such a decision? What experiences have you had in this scenario? Please feel free to share your thoughts by leaving a comment!

Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest

Related Posts

BREAKING NEWS! Entrepreneurs who need to raise capital will have no restrictions!

Hi Everyone! The moment many of us have been waiting for has finally arrived! About an hour ago, the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to approve the FINAL rules for Title III Equity Crowdfunding under the JOBS act legislation. What this means is that in approximately 90 days, ANYONE, regardless of income, will be able to invest in a startup by purchasing shares or issuing debt and earning a financial return on their investment. This also provides entrepreneurs who need to raise capital a HUGE new investor pool as there are no restrictions on income or net worth in order to make an investment (there are caps / safeguards however built into the legislation). I will update you all as I get more information but today is a HUGE day to celebrate! To everyone who has been following this movement for the last few years, get ready for things to change in a HUGE way! Manolis Sfinarolakis Founder & CEO RCTV & VICN This is great news for Entrepreneurs who want to raise funds from the general population. I’ll post more on this later, in the meantime please share and celebrate! John Waters [shareaholic app=”follow_buttons” id=”26833294″]

Read More »

If an Employee Right to Disconnect Law Came to the United States, Would Your Business Be Prepared?

If an Employee Right to Disconnect Law Came to the United States, Would Your Business Be Prepared? Today’s fast-paced, technology-driven world allows everyone to be constantly connected. While this offers a lot of convenience and greatly bolsters collaboration, it does contribute to disappearing boundaries between work and play. In other words, employers can reach their employees, even when said employees aren’t on the company clock. Enter the concept of an Employee Right to Disconnect Law – a movement that is gaining considerable traction. Right now, it’s mostly in Europe. But what would happen if such a law were to come to the United States? Would your business be prepared for the changes it would bring? Let’s explore the possible implications and how you can ensure that your business is ready. Understanding the Employee Right to Disconnect The Employee Right to Disconnect is a legal concept that aims to protect employees from being obligated to respond to work-related communications outside of their regular working hours. It allows employees to truly disconnect from work and enjoy their personal time without the fear of repercussions. In recent years, several countries have introduced employee right to disconnect laws to address the growing issue of work-life balance in an increasingly connected world. Again, these laws aim to protect employees from being contacted outside of working hours and to ensure that they have the right to disconnect from work-related communication. Currently, France, Portugal, and Australia have an employee right to disconnect law, while Spain, Ireland, Germany, and Italy are considering adopting such a measure. Although there is no federal law in the United States currently in place that guarantees the right to disconnect, some states, such as New York and California, have introduced bills to protect employees from being contacted outside of working hours. So, it’s at least something to be aware of and begin to tentatively plan for. Implications for Businesses If an Employee Right to Disconnect Law were to be implemented in the US, businesses would necessarily need to adapt their policies and practices to comply with the new regulations. This could mean setting clear boundaries for when employees are expected to be available and ensuring that work-related communications are not sent during non-working hours. Is Your Business Prepared? To determine if your business is prepared for an Employee Right to Disconnect Law, ask yourself the following questions: Do we have clear policies in place regarding work-related communications outside of working hours? Are managers and employees trained on the importance of disconnecting from work to maintain a healthy work-life balance? Have we implemented technology solutions that can help limit after-hours work communication? Ensuring Compliance To ensure that your business is ready for an Employee Right to Disconnect Law, consider implementing the following strategies: Establish clear guidelines for work-related communication outside of regular working hours. Provide training to managers and employees on the importance of disconnecting from work. Utilize technology tools that can help automate processes and limit after-hours communication. This means you should be at least tentatively preparing your business for a potential Employee Right to Disconnect Law. By taking proactive steps to establish clear policies and promote a healthy work-life balance, you can ensure that your business is ready for any regulatory changes that may come its way. Want to Accomplish More? Do you want your company to grow faster and earn more while you spend more time with your family doing all the things you started your business to do? We can make that dream a reality. Give us 30 minutes and we will show you how to get your life back. Skeptical? Good! Put us to the test. You can call us for your free appointment at 602-435-5474, or, if you prefer, send us an email. You can also visit us at Waters Business Consulting Group to learn more about us and the services we offer.

Read More »

Managers should Avoid these Phrases to Avoid Killing Employees’ Trust in Their Leadership

When it comes to the workplace, trust is key. Employees need to trust their managers in order to feel comfortable taking risks and be productive. Managers, in turn, need to trust their employees in order to delegate tasks and give them the freedom to make decisions. Unfortunately, many managers say things that damage this trust relationship. So, let’s discuss five of the most common phrases that managers use that kill employees’ trust. Words can Speak Louder than Actions Managers should avoid the following phrases in order to maintain a trusting relationship with their employees. Trust is essential for a healthy workplace and these phrases can damage that trust relationship. Employees need to feel comfortable coming to their managers with questions and concerns, and they need to know that their manager will be open and transparent with them. The employee-manager relationship is one of the primary components to a strong organizational structure. Employees rely on their managers for career development and guidance on how to improve their skills. One of the elements of a successful employee-manager relationship is trust. When the sense of trust is strong between an employee and manager, it adds efficiency to other elements of workplace productivity. —Houston Chronicle Small Business When managers use these phrases, it sends the opposite message. It makes employees feel unimportant and disregarded. It creates uncertainty and frustration, which leads to a lack of trust on the part of the employees. And that, of course, results in a negative impact on morale, productivity, and overall company culture — three poison pills that can cause actual, long-lasting damage. Five Phrases Managers should Avoid to Avoid Destroying Employee Trust We’ve all heard the age-old wisdom about sticks and stones breaking bones but words never inflicting harm. Of course, this philosophy is entirely contextual because we all vividly remember instances when words cut deep. While these phrases aren’t intended to insult or hurt, they nevertheless undermine your authority, respect, and relatability. So, avoid using the following phrases because they will slowly kill employee’s trust: “I’m the boss, I don’t have to explain my decisions.” This phrase is incredibly damaging to trust. Employees need to feel like they can come to their managers with questions and that their manager will be open and transparent with them. When a manager uses this phrase, it sends the message that the employee is not valued and that their opinion does not matter. It also makes the manager seem like they are hiding something. This can lead to employees feeling uncomfortable coming to their managers with questions or suggestions, which can hurt productivity and morale. “I’m too busy to deal with this right now.” This phrase often comes across as dismissive and unprofessional. It sends the message that the employee’s concerns are not a priority and that their manager is too busy to deal with them. This can make employees feel unimportant and disregarded. It can also lead to them feeling like they are not able to come to their manager with problems or concerns, which can hurt morale and productivity. “I’ll get back to you.” This phrase often comes across as ambiguous and frustrating for employees. Employees want to know what is going on and they want answers from their managers. When a manager says this phrase, it sends the message that the employee is being ignored and that their question is not important. It also creates uncertainty, which can lead to employees feeling anxious and stressed. “I’m not sure, let me check on that.” This phrase is often used as a way to avoid making a decision or taking responsibility. It sends the message that the manager is not capable of making decisions and that they are not in charge. This can make employees feel like they are not being taken seriously and that their concerns are not important. It can also lead to frustration and a lack of trust on the part of the employees. “That’s not my job.” This phrase communicates that the manager does not care about their employees or their job responsibilities. It sends the message that the employee is unimportant and that their job is irrelevant. This can lead to employees feeling unvalued and unmotivated. It can also cause them to feel like they are not able to come to their manager with questions or concerns, which can hurt morale and productivity. Which other phrases would you include in this list? Please take a moment to share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Read More »