The prisoner’s dilemma is a simple principle that explains a very inconvenient paradox. That being, when two or more people are in competition to reach the same goal, instead of working together, they’ll more often make self-serving or sub-optimal choices to their desired end. In other words, they won’t work as a team, attempting to obtain the same result, but rather, as mutual competitors. When this happens, it can easily lead to unhealthy competition, jealousy, infighting, and poor company morale. Fortunately, there are a few effective strategies to cope with such situations. What Causes the Prisoner’s Dilemma in Business Named for a scenario to explain why prisoners do not routinely rise up against the guards of a penitentiary, the prisoner’s dilemma attempts to define why it is that inmates don’t rally together to overtake the facility in order to ultimately escape. (After all, they greatly outnumber the guards and other staff.) …a teaming mindset must be adopted on purpose. Team leaders must paint success in the team as something shared and expansive. Because seeing success this way is rarely spontaneous, leaders have to go out of their way to convey — to sell, really — the upside of collaborative work. The message must be that success can be greater and more exciting when people work together. When this is done well, team members tend to focus more on the work than on themselves. They also focus on what the work means for the company’s value proposition — for their customers. —Harvard Business Review The reason behind it is simple — while everyone might be ostensibly working toward the same goal, that is taking over and breaking out of the prison, each person will act in their own individual best interest — this ultimately leads to chaos and of course, makes the end goal of escaping nearly impossible. Effective Strategies for Dealing with the Prisoner’s Dilemma in Business You might have noticed this dynamic working out among your sales team or any given group of employees. They seem to be in a constant state of competition, even to the point of harming your company’s overall goals. The good news is there are ways to deal with such scenarios, like the following: Encourage healthy discussions. Although some individuals seemingly always do what’s only in their self-interest, very few will continue such behavior if they know that it’s counterproductive to their future. During sales meetings, come up with common strategies that everyone can agree to follow and put everyone on the same path toward your desired goals. Scrutinize potential hires. If someone has a very impressive track record, but hops from one company to another, that’s obviously a red flag. So, listen carefully during the interview process for attitudes that convey job dissatisfaction, unhealthy competition with previous employees/employers, and other negative perspectives and emotions. Such individuals will tell you in not-so-subtle ways that they don’t work well with others. Reward genuine teamwork. Ronald Reagan copied a famous inspirational phrase by repeating this sentiment, “It’s amazing what can be accomplished when nobody cares who gets the credit.” This is very difficult for any group, especially those in a competitive environment. But, if you reward everyone involved for working as a team to reach their goals, you reinforce positive behaviors. What other suggestions do you have? Please take a moment to comment and share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your unique perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

An exit interview is conducted for two principal purposes. The first is to learn about the soon-to-be former employee’s experiences at the company. The second is to determine the reason he or she is leaving. Those are pretty straightforward and can provide valuable insight into how a business operates from an employee’s point of view. This is why large corporations establish these separation procedures. However, even small businesses can take advantage of what exit interviews have to offer. Downsides to Holding Exit Interviews Now, there are of course pros and cons to conducting exit interviews. The first and perhaps most obvious is that a future former employee May be unwilling and/or apprehensive about the possibility of burning bridges. In other words, you might not get the unfettered truth to every answer. Plus, it’s possible the person will go out of his or her way not to offer honest answers. Then, there’s also the possibility he or she will hold back information and that of course can undermine the entire exercise. Exit interviews are conducted to generate feedback from employees with the goal to lower employee turnover rate, raise employee retention, and improves aspects of the organization as a whole. After conducting the interviews and reviewing the data, organizations will use the employees’ suggestions to create a better organization for which their employees want to work and succeed. —Work Institute.com What’s more, if you do get the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, your action on the other side can be very detrimental. After all, the departing employee might provide valuable insight into correcting certain issues or problems within his or her position that could benefit his or her successor and/or, the business as a whole. Failing to apply solutions could result in remaining employees knowing that nothing was done, and that can be quite damaging to morale. 3 Biggest Exit Interview Benefits Obviously, companies conduct interviews as part of their business practices for good reason. And, as mentioned above, even small businesses can reap the same benefits. Here are the biggest advantages of conducting exit interviews: Gain inside perspective. Managers, administrators, and owners are routinely surprised by what they learn through exit interviews. Because they are in charge at the top, they believe they have some sort of omniscient knowledge, but that’s certainly not always true. In fact, this is why third-party HR services offer exit interviews since they understand through experience that the upper echelons of companies aren’t always aware of everything that’s actually going on. Discover unknown issues. Along the same line, it’s not only learning the intricate dynamics or the minutiae of a certain position, but also the problems and issues that affect said position being vacated. It’s not at all unusual for the exit interviewee to reveal certain points of friction or areas of frustration with the position they are leaving. This too is very valuable information and gives the company and opportunity to make key changes. Increase employee retention. One of the main reasons companies conduct exit interviews is to gain knowledge of the benefits listed above in order to enact reforms or policy initiatives that serve the employees better. By doing so, the businesses are able to improve on their operational practices and that can also benefit other areas, such as employee cohesion, morale, and productivity. What other advantages do exit interviews offer? Please take a brief moment to leave a comment and share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your input. Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.