3 Sure-Fire Ways to Exhaust and Infuriate Good Employees

No manager or business owner sets out to sabotage their employees. But, that’s sometimes the end result, brought on by a number of different behaviors. For instance, it’s well known that holding unnecessary meetings is a great way to agitate and irk team members. After all, they know superfluousness when they’re unwillingly subjected to it. So, it only serves to bother and anger people. But, that’s not the only way entrepreneurs and managers alike aggravate and annoy employees, there are others.

Employees’ Needs are Important

Your employees’ needs must be met in order for them to respect you. That doesn’t mean giving them everything they want. But, it does mean treating them the same way you’d want to be treated if you were in their shoes. For instance, unclear communication. Being unclear is just as bad as being unkind. Without clarity, you’re not providing ample direction and that is a real source of frustration for your employees.

Toxic company culture often starts at the top in the active bad behavior of a senior leader or by those who have supervisory responsibilities. To get the root of the problem follow the toxicity wherever it leads because people don’t leave companies, they leave managers. —Entrepreneur.com

Conversely, there’s also such a thing as providing too much detail. It’s the true-life version of drinking from a fire hose. You’re providing way too much information to process. This inevitably results in bewilderment and/or confusion. Unsurprisingly, employees don’t really understand the overall picture because you’re losing them in the minutia.

3 Sure-Fire Ways to Exhaust and Infuriate Good Employees

Although the above examples are ways to run down employee morale, three other behaviors will outright cause them to sour. Here are the three ways that entrepreneurs and managers effectively ruin their teams:

  • Micromanaging. This is probably the most hated and counterproductive managerial trait of them all. By not giving people their independence and autonomy, you are disrespecting them. Plus, this stifles them intellectually and creatively. Moreover, it results in feeling unappreciated and resentment builds. In short, there’s nothing good that comes from micromanaging.
  • Making too many changes. While change can be a good thing, and sometimes it’s absolutely necessary, too many changes will only cause chaos. Employees will lose track of what is acceptable and what’s not and will eventually fail to recall the latest policies and procedures and even goals.
  • Being indecisive and too emotional. When you lead with enthusiasm and vision, that’s a great way to get your team members excited. But, If you lead by raw emotion only and worse yet, can’t make a decision at critical moments, you’ve clearly demonstrated your not cut out for a role in leadership. Yes, there will be difficult decisions and times when emotions will run high or low, but you have to stay calm and avoid rash decisions. Or, failing to make any decisions whatsoever.

What other managerial behaviors do you think irritate and/or undermine employees? Please share your thoughts and experiences by commenting!

Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest

Related Posts

The T-Mobile-Sprint Merger Raises these Important Questions

The T-Mobile-Sprint merger is generating a plethora of headlines. Some think it’s a bad idea. Others believe it will provide certain benefits. Still others don’t see a clear winner. Regardless of where you stand, it does raise a few interesting questions. We all understand what a merger is — the combining of two entities into one. But, there’s a lot more to it than just this simple explanation. The truth is, there are distinct advantages and disadvantages of merging two organizations. Common Merger Disadvantages Let’s begin with one of the most obvious pain points — employee morale. The reason two brands come together is to improve their performance. However, this often means the elimination of duplicate roles. And, rank-and-file employees instinctively know this fact. Another downside to merging is that it can create more debt. Teaming up means taking on the balance sheet obligations, which can easily become problematic. …making changes to your business include the economic and political climate in which you operate. Determine whether tax or trade laws in your region are friendly toward the types of modifications you want to make. You may come to the conclusion that now is a good time to move forward with the desired alterations or you may elect to wait for circumstances to change in your favor. —Bix Fluent.com Then, there’s another intangible — company cultures. One organization might operate with a completely different dynamic than the other. Which might manifest trouble when the two become one entity. Of course, merging means the essential elimination of the top decision maker. Instead, there are at least a few people on either side of the aisle. Biggest Merger Advantages Now, let’s take a look at the upsides of merging. The point of coming together is to improve the performance and ensure a better future for both companies. Here are the top merger advantages: Improved efficiency. We’ve already partially mentioned this but here’s the other side of eliminating redundant positions — increased efficiency. A merger can provide a new environment to improve efficiency on many levels. New territories. When two companies come together, it’s likely that one (or both) parties will benefit from the introduction of new territories. It’s a way to tap into market share without undergoing the growing pains. Cost-effective expansion. Speaking of growing pains, a merge creates an opportunity to expand without all the normal hassles. It allows for the identification of the best assets, which means increased productivity. Multiple growth opportunities. Two previously competing businesses combined as one opens up a number of growth opportunities. Instead of working to beat one another, they now work in unison toward one or more goals. What other consideration would you factor into such a decision? What experiences have you had in this scenario? Please feel free to share your thoughts by leaving a comment! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Read More »

4 Big Problems with a WFH and On-Site Hybrid Business Operation

With the roll-backs of local, state, and federal COVID-19 restrictions, businesses are attempting to return to a state of normalcy. But, reinstating pre-pandemic conditions isn’t as simple as they ought to be, and too many entrepreneurs are experiencing such a cruel reality. So, some are experimenting with a hybrid solution: a combination of work-from-home or WFH and on-site business operation. Sure, it certainly sounds like a logical solution. But, every solution breeds new problems. Meaning, there are distinct disadvantages to adopting a WFH and on-site business model. Biggest Hybrid Workplace Advantages Obviously, corporations around the world wouldn’t put a hybrid model in-place unless it had substantial benefits. And, there are some compelling reasons, like the potential of increased productivity via a customizable schedule. After all, happy employees are more productive and that’s certainly good for the bottom line. Then, there’s the morale boost which comes from being able to choose from WFH and on-site. Employees cherish the freedom and that too, helps to boost both productivity and morale. What many companies are converging on is a mixture of remote working and traditional office working, known as the hybrid workplace. A hybrid workplace exists when a business allows their employees to work either remotely or from the office. In a typical hybrid workplace, employees have the choice of working in a central office, working from home, or splitting their time between the two. —WeWork Ideas Blog Additionally, it can help to reduce operating costs, which decrease with the lessened need of supporting individuals constantly on-site. Moreover, it allows employees to avoid toxic situations. For instance, two or more employees who don’t get along very well in-person can find relief by not having to be in close proximity. 4 Issues with a WFH and On-Site Hybrid Business Operation While a hybrid operation might sound like a perfect answer, that just isn’t the case. Unfortunately, there are big potential problems with adopting a hybrid model, as the following issues might present: Managing a hybrid team is very difficult. Anyone with experience in managing a team is familiar with the vast time and effort that goes into making it work. Now, add-in a bunch of other variables that weren’t present before and it’s easy to imagine just how more difficult or nightmarish managing people in totally different physical locations is in reality. Some WFH employees will take advantage. Put this problem in the all-too-obvious column: some employees will exploit the new policies to their own personal advantage, even if it results in harming others and/or the company. While it’s not something you might relish thinking about, it is most definitely a possibility or perhaps, even a probability. A hybrid scenario can easily foster resentment. Another potential problem is along the same lines as the one above — that one or more employees will gain a sense of others’ nefarious behaviors regarding the hybrid operation. That could very well cause resentment to rear its ugly head. Not everyone will contribute the same amount. Expounding on the last two possible issues, is the real possibility one or more employees will shuffle responsibilities off their own shoulders and onto their coworkers through a form of sleight of hand. What other suggestions do you have to deal with potential work-from-home issues? Please take a few minutes to share your thoughts and experiences. Perhaps others can benefit from your unique perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Read More »

Pros and Cons of Work-Share Programs

In times of uncertainty, particularly when there’s a financial crisis, work-share programs can serve as a temporary solution. But, these systems are not perfect. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean you should outright dismiss the option. Read on to learn more about the pros and cons of work-share programs. Biggest Downsides of Work-Shares As the nearby quote explains, work-share programs are offered by local governments to help small businesses in times of need. They give businesses the ability to reduce employee hours without having to resort to letting them go. As you might imagine, work-shares have their pros and cons. And, the first downside is that your business (or employees) might not qualify. If it does, another downside is that it could be more lucrative for team members to find alternative employment. Work-share programs let businesses temporarily reduce the hours of their employees, instead of laying them off during economic downturns. Technically referred to as short time compensation, the goal of work-sharing programs is to reduce unemployment. Work-sharing should not be confused with job sharing, which allows two part-time employees to share one full-time job. Instead, work-sharing allows a full-time worker’s hours to be reduced, in lieu of laying off the worker. —National Conference of State Legislatures Of course, if there’s an outright unemployment option that effectively supplies comparable or more compensation, that’s another downside. Then, there’s the matter of timing. Meaning, how long you’ll need the assistance and whether or not it’s sufficient to carry you and your employees through. Top Advantages of Work-Shares Now, there are obviously good things that come with work-share programs. These can be a real lifeline when you and your business needs it most. Here are some of the largest benefits of work-share programs: You can avoid layoffs. Okay, the most obvious advantage is the fact that you don’t have to resort to firing team members from your company. Work-share programs help you to keep your employees on the payroll, even if it’s a smaller one. It provides ongoing continuity. Another benefit is that your business can essentially carry on as usual (or as good as possible) for at least a short period of time. That can really help to save your business’ operations and keep productivity going. The arrangement helps maintain morale. Yet another upside to a work-share program is it helps to keep morale up since you’re keeping people employed and in a familiar work environment — even if it’s temporarily in another setting. You don’t have to start over again when it’s over. When the time comes to resume normal operations, the ability to retain employees helps you avoid having to hire all new staff and start over by training from scratch. What other pros and cons would you add to the list? Please comment and share your thoughts and experiences! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Read More »