How to Deal with an Employee with Limited Work Capacity

Having a good employee who is restricted in their capabilities can be a very challenging situation. This is especially true if he or she is a valued team member, but can’t put in the hours due to certain limitations. Whether it’s a preexisting condition, and injury suffered on or off the job, you obviously have moral, ethical, and legal responsibilities to him or her. However, this doesn’t mean that they are completely protected from being terminated or having their role and/or responsibilities changed. Although this article isn’t specifically about legal ramifications, it will give you some effective tools on how to deal with this particular set of circumstances. Read on to learn more about how to deal with an employee who has limited capacity.

Every Situation is Different

Limited capacity can mean the number of things, including an inability to perform certain physical tasks, and other situations. But, most often it is due to a physical limitation which prevents him or her from fulfilling one or more of their responsibilities. These can range widely, from an inability to lift certain amounts, to not being able to sit for a protracted period of time.
An ever persistent problem facing employers is what to do with the employee who is chronically sick or has a serious health problem. Besides the obvious issues it presents to the employer- additional strain on other employees to pick up the slack; inability to properly staff and manage work loads; basic coverage concerns- there are also potential state and federal legal ramifications if the absences are not handled and documented correctly. —HNI Risk Services
Whatever the case may be, It is up to you to be as accommodating as possible, without fully compromising your company’s position. In other words, it’s best to strike a balance and find a happy medium where you can accommodate their needs while also allowing them to fulfill most or all of their work responsibilities.

3 Key Ways to Deal with an Employee with a Limited Work Capacity

There’s no hard-and-fast set of rules for coping with an employee who can only work in a limited capacity. After all, no two sets of circumstances are exactly the same. But, there are some general parameters you should observe. Here are three good ways to deal with a team member who is limited in their work capacity:
  • Gain a real understanding of the circumstances. Whether it’s a back problem, issues with a disease, or anything else, you need to have a very clear idea of what’s going on with your employee. Understand precisely what his or her limitations are and aren’t. This way, you’ll have enough information to make good decisions when it comes to his or her role and responsibilities.
  • Make strategic concessions where necessary. Even your best employee can suffer from very unfortunate sets of circumstances and still be able to contribute to your company in a number of ways. Though it’s difficult to comprehend or even accept, it could be a detriment to your business (that is, if you insist on keeping everything the same). So, think outside the box and make strategic changes so he or she can continue to be a productive asset for your company.
  • Realistically reassess the situation periodically. Sometimes, this can be a long-lasting situation that can go on for years. Or, it could only last for several months. Regardless, you need to take the time to reassess the situation every now and again.
What other suggestions do you have? Please take a moment to share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your unique perspective; it’s greatly appreciated! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest

Related Posts

3 Subtle but Serious Signs a Business Partnership is in Big Trouble

Ostensibly, a partnership is an ideal way to bring two necessary but different skill-sets together. After all, it makes sense to join various strengths in order to form an alliance. Such an arrangement seems like it will yield fruitful results. However, far more partnerships fail than succeed. There are many obvious reasons why this happens. But, it’s not always so clear-cut. So, let’s take a look at some subtle telltale signs that a partnership is in trouble. The Biggest Partnership Dangers Dave Ramsey has made famous his five dangerous D’s of partnerships: death, disability, disinterest, drugs, and divorce. Of those, only one makes the list below. That’s because it’s not always crystal clear that something is awry. You generally spend more waking hours at work than at home, which means you have more opportunities to interact with your business partner and the nature of your interactions tend to be more intense, with more potential for conflict because there are so many external variables that are beyond your control. —Forbes.com There are scenarios when very subtle factors are in play. Unfortunately, most business people miss these signals put out by their partners. Eventually, they become more pronounced and at that point, it is usually too late to save the enterprise. 3 Signs a Business Partnership is in Jeopardy When a business partner goes through a very difficult time in his or her life, it’s usually quite easy to see the writing on the wall. But, there are instances when there are no overt problems or issues. Here are three subtle yet serious signs a business partnership is in trouble: Apathetic. Let’s begin with the only sign that makes the list above — disinterest. This can manifest in two different but similar forms: distraction and apathy. A lack of concern and focus can wreak loads of havoc on a business. Before you know it, the onus falls on you alone. That’s when you’ll realize your partner is no longer interested in participating. And, by this time, it usually causes an irreversible rift. Autonomy. On the opposite side of the spectrum is autonomy. Sure, being able to operate independently is typically a good thing. Except when there’s far too much of it. So much, you find out about key decisions well after the fact. This is a sign that unpleasant news is most likely on its way to you. Elusive. This is a very tough one and perhaps, the most frustrating of the two because it’s so difficult to understand. When your partner becomes elusive, that is to say, overzealous one moment and indifferent the next, you’ll struggle to cope with why. This will only lead to unnecessary disruptions and make the partnership unsustainable. What other signs would you add to the list? Please share your thoughts and experiences by commenting! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Read More »

Managers should Avoid these Phrases to Avoid Killing Employees’ Trust in Their Leadership

When it comes to the workplace, trust is key. Employees need to trust their managers in order to feel comfortable taking risks and be productive. Managers, in turn, need to trust their employees in order to delegate tasks and give them the freedom to make decisions. Unfortunately, many managers say things that damage this trust relationship. So, let’s discuss five of the most common phrases that managers use that kill employees’ trust. Words can Speak Louder than Actions Managers should avoid the following phrases in order to maintain a trusting relationship with their employees. Trust is essential for a healthy workplace and these phrases can damage that trust relationship. Employees need to feel comfortable coming to their managers with questions and concerns, and they need to know that their manager will be open and transparent with them. The employee-manager relationship is one of the primary components to a strong organizational structure. Employees rely on their managers for career development and guidance on how to improve their skills. One of the elements of a successful employee-manager relationship is trust. When the sense of trust is strong between an employee and manager, it adds efficiency to other elements of workplace productivity. —Houston Chronicle Small Business When managers use these phrases, it sends the opposite message. It makes employees feel unimportant and disregarded. It creates uncertainty and frustration, which leads to a lack of trust on the part of the employees. And that, of course, results in a negative impact on morale, productivity, and overall company culture — three poison pills that can cause actual, long-lasting damage. Five Phrases Managers should Avoid to Avoid Destroying Employee Trust We’ve all heard the age-old wisdom about sticks and stones breaking bones but words never inflicting harm. Of course, this philosophy is entirely contextual because we all vividly remember instances when words cut deep. While these phrases aren’t intended to insult or hurt, they nevertheless undermine your authority, respect, and relatability. So, avoid using the following phrases because they will slowly kill employee’s trust: “I’m the boss, I don’t have to explain my decisions.” This phrase is incredibly damaging to trust. Employees need to feel like they can come to their managers with questions and that their manager will be open and transparent with them. When a manager uses this phrase, it sends the message that the employee is not valued and that their opinion does not matter. It also makes the manager seem like they are hiding something. This can lead to employees feeling uncomfortable coming to their managers with questions or suggestions, which can hurt productivity and morale. “I’m too busy to deal with this right now.” This phrase often comes across as dismissive and unprofessional. It sends the message that the employee’s concerns are not a priority and that their manager is too busy to deal with them. This can make employees feel unimportant and disregarded. It can also lead to them feeling like they are not able to come to their manager with problems or concerns, which can hurt morale and productivity. “I’ll get back to you.” This phrase often comes across as ambiguous and frustrating for employees. Employees want to know what is going on and they want answers from their managers. When a manager says this phrase, it sends the message that the employee is being ignored and that their question is not important. It also creates uncertainty, which can lead to employees feeling anxious and stressed. “I’m not sure, let me check on that.” This phrase is often used as a way to avoid making a decision or taking responsibility. It sends the message that the manager is not capable of making decisions and that they are not in charge. This can make employees feel like they are not being taken seriously and that their concerns are not important. It can also lead to frustration and a lack of trust on the part of the employees. “That’s not my job.” This phrase communicates that the manager does not care about their employees or their job responsibilities. It sends the message that the employee is unimportant and that their job is irrelevant. This can lead to employees feeling unvalued and unmotivated. It can also cause them to feel like they are not able to come to their manager with questions or concerns, which can hurt morale and productivity. Which other phrases would you include in this list? Please take a moment to share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Read More »
Discarded napkin test

Have You Tried the Discarded Napkin Test?

Have you tried the discarded napkin test? Perhaps you’ve never heard of it because it isn’t an actual thing. But, this simple sociological experiment does reveal some fascinating insight into how we perceive others and gauge various environments. Don’t bother Googling it, you won’t find any on-point results. However, that doesn’t mean it’s not useful. Try the Discarded Napkin Test for Yourself The discarded napkin test is a simple one. And, it clearly demonstrates the importance of appearance. Here it is: go into a casual restaurant prior to the lunch hour rush. Crumple a clean napkin and place it on a clean but empty table. Sit nearby and watch how many people past the “tainted” table up for another. Eventually, if there’s no more tables available, someone will muster the courage to clean it off. Or, give into the frustration of the limited seating options and swipe it to the floor. Many workplaces have dress codes, particularly workplaces in industries in which image is highly valued and workplaces in which employees have regular face-to-face contact with customers. Whether you are considering setting a dress code for an existing workplace or trying to decide whether your new retail store will require employees to adhere to a dress code, consider the broad benefits and potential drawbacks — like backlash from casual-dressing employees — of such a move. —Houston Chronicle The point is, people will choose to sit elsewhere even when the only flaw with a table is a discarded napkin. That’s it. Its unpleasing appearance is enough to turn off person after person. Although a bit strange, it’s true. And, it begs the question — are employee dress codes good or bad? Employee Dress Codes Pros and Cons Okay, so there are a number of dumb office rules that drive employees crazy. But, some make sense to enforce. When it comes to employee dress codes, it’s not always cut and dry. This means, while an employee dress code can actually be a good policy, it can also be a bad idea. Here are some employee dress code pros and cons to consider: Pro — professional appearance. The single biggest benefit of an employee dress code is it provides a professional appearance. It’s especially useful in retail settings and offices. In the former, uniforms distinguish employees while the latter, business casual provides a professional yet laid back experience. Con — stifles personal style. Although a dress code does provide a more professional experience, it also can stifle personal style. That can mean rebellion, particularly in an office setting. Team members might feel an imposition and possibly a bit untrusted. Pro — provides “uniform” experience. Of course, you’d like your business to send a uniform message, which uniforms undeniably provide. However, in an office setting, this is a little more problematic. But, broad rules with clear prohibitions usually works well. Con — needs consistent policing. Now, the biggest downside of any dress code is the need to police it constantly and consistently. Otherwise, it’s just a suggestion and not enforced policy. At least, that’s the way employees will feel. What other pros and cons of employee dress codes have you experienced? Do you favor a strict dress code or a loose one? Please share your thoughts and experiences by commenting! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Read More »