One of the most costly and infuriating aspects of running a business is training new employees only to have them up and abruptly quit. It takes a lot of time, effort, and extra expense to onboard new hires and get them familiar with practices and procedures. When they depart shortly after their training, it means having to fill that position all over again. Since this is such a huge hassle and a costly one at that, some companies are actually billing employees who quit. The strategy is to ensure new employees don’t receive critical industry training only to leave and use their new skills at a competitor paying higher wages and/or offering more enticing benefits packages. Companies Recovering Employee Training Costs through TRAPs Healthcare, retail, trucking, beauty, and more companies are adopting a new approach in order to reduce their workforce losses. Known as Training Repayment Agreement Provisions or TRAPs, these clauses are included in employee contracts. Nearly 10% of all American companies are now using these provisions, according to a recent report by Reuters News. When a valued employee quits, the loss can have a detrimental effect on the person’s team and department and maybe even on the entire company. Not only can an unexpected departure lead to lost revenue, but it also could lower the morale and productivity of remaining employees. —Society for Human Resource Management Other industries may follow this emerging trend if it proves successful and legal. There are already federal and state government agencies looking into the practice, and it appears to be legitimate. If it continues to grow in popularity, it should be not only a big benefit to businesses but to employees as well, as both parties will know precisely what’s expected of them and how to proceed accordingly. How to Use Employee Training Repayment Agreement Provisions Because this is somewhat new, it’s very important to take thoughtful, measured steps in order to implement such a practice. Here are some suggestions for how to use an employee training repayment agreement provision in your business: Consult a labor law attorney. The very first thing you should do is to speak with a lawyer who specializes in labor law in your state. Even if a future employee willingly signs such an agreement, there may be something on the books that does not allow you to enforce such a provision. So, be crystal clear it is legal and actionable in your state. Speak with your human resources department. Obviously if you are able to include an employee training repayment agreement provision in your hiring contracts, you’ll need to get the right people in your organization on board and in the know. You can help to develop a new section in your training process that discloses and advises potential hires and new team member about this provision. Make sure new hires are made fully aware of the provision. When you’re recruiting someone new to your organization, be sure this is made abundantly clear before you proceed with follow-up interviews and probably before the very first, initial interview. Any job candidate should be made aware of this provision well before you get deep into the hiring process. Include a mechanism to recoup new employee training costs. Of course, you’ll need a way to actually recoup those training costs. So, if you offer a sign-on bonus, that may be one way to recapture the expense. Here again, you’ll need to consult an experienced, licensed labor law attorney in your state to establish a recuperation mechanism for the provision. What else would you suggest business owners do to deal with new hires who quit shortly after being brought on? Please share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your input! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

It’s Said Style without Substance is Bad, But Is the Opposite Actually Better or Even Worse? We’ve all heard “beware of style over substance.” It’s a common expression that means a person may appear to have all the answers but in reality, there is very little or nothing behind his or her facade. Likewise, it also describes someone who puts greater value on appearance than depth of knowledge or skill. In either case, it fools others into thinking an individual possesses something special when in fact, they aren’t extraordinary after all. This distinction is particularly important when it comes to choosing a business partner, a vendor, or even a client. So, entrepreneurs need to be aware and alert of the telltale signs and more critically, what the downsides of each personality are. Sure, it seems obvious that all style and no substance is bad. However, it’s equally vital to understand that the opposite can be harmful, too. The Dangers of Style Over Substance A person who is all style and no substance may have all the necessary skills. But when the moment of truth arrives, he or she is lost. However, that’s a broad generalization of a greater specific. So, let’s take a look at some of the particular reasons why a businessperson with all style and no substance can be problematic: Lack of follow-through. They might make grand promises or claims but fail to deliver on them due to a lack of underlying strategy or execution skills. Superficial relationships. They may prioritize networking and appearances over building genuine connections, leading to fleeting and ultimately unproductive partnerships. Misalignment with company values. A style-over-substance leader may struggle to foster a culture of substance and results if a business’s success depends on innovation or problem-solving. Short-term thinking. They might focus on quick wins and flashy projects rather than building a sustainable and long-term strategy for the business. Potential for ethical lapses. Without a strong foundation of integrity and competence, such individuals might resort to unethical tactics to maintain appearances. It’s important to note that style and charisma can be valuable assets in business. However, without substance to back them up, they can be detrimental to long-term success. Downsides of a Substantively-Focused Business Partner with No Personality or Style Now, we’ll get into the opposite scenario. Although people are familiar with the shortcomings of style over substance, what are the downsides of an individual who has very little or no charisma? While substance is undoubtedly crucial in business, a complete lack of personality or style can also present big challenges, such as the following: Limited networking and relationship building. Someone with little personality might need to work on building rapport with clients, partners, or employees. Effective business relationships often involve personal connection. Lack of creativity and innovation. A purely analytical approach can sometimes hinder creative problem-solving and out-of-the-box thinking. Difficulty adapting to change. A rigid, no-nonsense approach might make it challenging to adapt to changing market conditions or unexpected challenges. Poor communication. A lack of personality can sometimes manifest in poor communication skills, leading to misunderstandings and inefficiencies. Uninspiring leadership. If the person takes on a leadership role, their lack of charisma could demotivate employees and hinder team morale. Limited market appeal. In customer-facing roles or industries focused on branding, a personality-devoid individual might struggle to connect with the target audience. Again, it’s important to note that a balance between substance and style is often ideal. A strong foundation of knowledge and skills combined with effective communication and interpersonal abilities can create a highly successful business partnership. Want to Accomplish More? Do you want your company to grow faster and earn more while you spend more time with your family doing all the things you started your business to do? We can make that dream a reality. Give us 30 minutes and we will show you how to get your life back. Skeptical? Good! Put us to the test. You can call us for your free appointment at (602) 541-1760, or, if you prefer,