Apple, Amazon Hit $1 Trillion while Brick-and-Mortars Lose — Here’s the Lesson

Make no mistake about it, this is a very serious situation, no matter the dollar amount. Regardless of what was spent and for which items, this is theft. It is essentially stealing company funds for personal use. Now, if this sounds way too stringent, that’s because you’re probably not thinking of it in a more dire manner (you likely have a very good relationship with this employee). However, if you strip all that aside and look at it in pure dollars and cents, along with personality traits like integrity, this ought to infuriate you. So, let’s take a look at what to do if an employee is using a company credit card for personal use. Common Company Credit Card Risks Obviously, putting company credit cards in the hands of employees assumes a certain level of risk. While you may have strict policies regarding their proper use, it’s still ultimately up to the individual to obey those rules. Of course, every employee with a company credit card must be trusted to a large extent. And even though he or she may have acted responsibly in the past, that certainly doesn’t guarantee he or she will continue to do so in the future. Corporate credit cards are an important tool for many companies. Using the company credit card is often the ideal way to manage individual expenses like entertaining clients and business travel. However, company credit cards are also one of the most notorious leaks of company funds to bad employee decisions. From simple bad budgeting decisions to outright fraud and theft, these cards create undue opportunity and temptation for employees to misuse company funds. Fortunately, you can keep these incidents to a minimum… —Business.com Company credit cards are given out as a matter of convenience, but they do not come without a substantial risk factor. For instance, an employee could get into a personal pinch and use the card for emergency situations at home and you’ll only find out about it after the fact. Then, there are a few incidental mistakes. It’s entirely possible that your employee has a similar-looking card and accidentally makes a purchase with the wrong one, using the company credit card rather than their own. In the latter example, it’s entirely understandable, but if he or she does not take a proactive attempt to reimburse you or simply says nothing and hopes it will slide by, you have a problem on your hands. How to Deal with an Employee Who uses a Company Credit Card for Personal Expenses There are really two different scenarios that could play out. Someone who uses a company credit card for small, inexpensive items and someone who routinely misuses the card for personal expenses. Here are some suggestions for how to deal with an employee who uses a company card for personal use: Know exactly what the purchases were. Before you say anything to this employee, be sure to go through the monthly statement line by line to identify the purchases and their amounts. It would also be wise to go back through the last few months’ worth of previous statements to see if this is a pattern or not. You might just discover this has been going on for quite a long time. Know the laws in your state. This is where it gets serious. Even if the card was used for small purchases over a long period, that could add up to a substantial amount of money. Depending on the laws in your state, this could constitute a criminal act. At the very least, if it isn’t considered criminal, it is certainly a fireable offense. Obviously, if the charges were extraordinarily large, you’ll probably want to recoup that money and possibly prosecute the offender. Speak with HR and/or an attorney. Here again, the amount spent and the timeline will be extremely pertinent. If these are large expenses, they could mean something like grand larceny or another crime. Conversely, if the amount spent was small, you might just ask the employee to reimburse the company, what you need to know is if this is severe enough, and what legal options you have, including the possibility of withholding part of their pay. If you do discover an employee has been using a company credit card for their personal expenses, it is very important to take action, regardless of how much was spent or on what and/or over what period of time. If you don’t deal with the situation directly, the behavior will likely continue to happen to the detriment of the company. Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

It’s Said Style without Substance is Bad, But Is the Opposite Actually Better or Even Worse? We’ve all heard “beware of style over substance.” It’s a common expression that means a person may appear to have all the answers but in reality, there is very little or nothing behind his or her facade. Likewise, it also describes someone who puts greater value on appearance than depth of knowledge or skill. In either case, it fools others into thinking an individual possesses something special when in fact, they aren’t extraordinary after all. This distinction is particularly important when it comes to choosing a business partner, a vendor, or even a client. So, entrepreneurs need to be aware and alert of the telltale signs and more critically, what the downsides of each personality are. Sure, it seems obvious that all style and no substance is bad. However, it’s equally vital to understand that the opposite can be harmful, too. The Dangers of Style Over Substance A person who is all style and no substance may have all the necessary skills. But when the moment of truth arrives, he or she is lost. However, that’s a broad generalization of a greater specific. So, let’s take a look at some of the particular reasons why a businessperson with all style and no substance can be problematic: Lack of follow-through. They might make grand promises or claims but fail to deliver on them due to a lack of underlying strategy or execution skills. Superficial relationships. They may prioritize networking and appearances over building genuine connections, leading to fleeting and ultimately unproductive partnerships. Misalignment with company values. A style-over-substance leader may struggle to foster a culture of substance and results if a business’s success depends on innovation or problem-solving. Short-term thinking. They might focus on quick wins and flashy projects rather than building a sustainable and long-term strategy for the business. Potential for ethical lapses. Without a strong foundation of integrity and competence, such individuals might resort to unethical tactics to maintain appearances. It’s important to note that style and charisma can be valuable assets in business. However, without substance to back them up, they can be detrimental to long-term success. Downsides of a Substantively-Focused Business Partner with No Personality or Style Now, we’ll get into the opposite scenario. Although people are familiar with the shortcomings of style over substance, what are the downsides of an individual who has very little or no charisma? While substance is undoubtedly crucial in business, a complete lack of personality or style can also present big challenges, such as the following: Limited networking and relationship building. Someone with little personality might need to work on building rapport with clients, partners, or employees. Effective business relationships often involve personal connection. Lack of creativity and innovation. A purely analytical approach can sometimes hinder creative problem-solving and out-of-the-box thinking. Difficulty adapting to change. A rigid, no-nonsense approach might make it challenging to adapt to changing market conditions or unexpected challenges. Poor communication. A lack of personality can sometimes manifest in poor communication skills, leading to misunderstandings and inefficiencies. Uninspiring leadership. If the person takes on a leadership role, their lack of charisma could demotivate employees and hinder team morale. Limited market appeal. In customer-facing roles or industries focused on branding, a personality-devoid individual might struggle to connect with the target audience. Again, it’s important to note that a balance between substance and style is often ideal. A strong foundation of knowledge and skills combined with effective communication and interpersonal abilities can create a highly successful business partnership. Want to Accomplish More? Do you want your company to grow faster and earn more while you spend more time with your family doing all the things you started your business to do? We can make that dream a reality. Give us 30 minutes and we will show you how to get your life back. Skeptical? Good! Put us to the test. You can call us for your free appointment at (602) 541-1760, or, if you prefer,

When it comes to the workplace, trust is key. Employees need to trust their managers in order to feel comfortable taking risks and be productive. Managers, in turn, need to trust their employees in order to delegate tasks and give them the freedom to make decisions. Unfortunately, many managers say things that damage this trust relationship. So, let’s discuss five of the most common phrases that managers use that kill employees’ trust. Words can Speak Louder than Actions Managers should avoid the following phrases in order to maintain a trusting relationship with their employees. Trust is essential for a healthy workplace and these phrases can damage that trust relationship. Employees need to feel comfortable coming to their managers with questions and concerns, and they need to know that their manager will be open and transparent with them. The employee-manager relationship is one of the primary components to a strong organizational structure. Employees rely on their managers for career development and guidance on how to improve their skills. One of the elements of a successful employee-manager relationship is trust. When the sense of trust is strong between an employee and manager, it adds efficiency to other elements of workplace productivity. —Houston Chronicle Small Business When managers use these phrases, it sends the opposite message. It makes employees feel unimportant and disregarded. It creates uncertainty and frustration, which leads to a lack of trust on the part of the employees. And that, of course, results in a negative impact on morale, productivity, and overall company culture — three poison pills that can cause actual, long-lasting damage. Five Phrases Managers should Avoid to Avoid Destroying Employee Trust We’ve all heard the age-old wisdom about sticks and stones breaking bones but words never inflicting harm. Of course, this philosophy is entirely contextual because we all vividly remember instances when words cut deep. While these phrases aren’t intended to insult or hurt, they nevertheless undermine your authority, respect, and relatability. So, avoid using the following phrases because they will slowly kill employee’s trust: “I’m the boss, I don’t have to explain my decisions.” This phrase is incredibly damaging to trust. Employees need to feel like they can come to their managers with questions and that their manager will be open and transparent with them. When a manager uses this phrase, it sends the message that the employee is not valued and that their opinion does not matter. It also makes the manager seem like they are hiding something. This can lead to employees feeling uncomfortable coming to their managers with questions or suggestions, which can hurt productivity and morale. “I’m too busy to deal with this right now.” This phrase often comes across as dismissive and unprofessional. It sends the message that the employee’s concerns are not a priority and that their manager is too busy to deal with them. This can make employees feel unimportant and disregarded. It can also lead to them feeling like they are not able to come to their manager with problems or concerns, which can hurt morale and productivity. “I’ll get back to you.” This phrase often comes across as ambiguous and frustrating for employees. Employees want to know what is going on and they want answers from their managers. When a manager says this phrase, it sends the message that the employee is being ignored and that their question is not important. It also creates uncertainty, which can lead to employees feeling anxious and stressed. “I’m not sure, let me check on that.” This phrase is often used as a way to avoid making a decision or taking responsibility. It sends the message that the manager is not capable of making decisions and that they are not in charge. This can make employees feel like they are not being taken seriously and that their concerns are not important. It can also lead to frustration and a lack of trust on the part of the employees. “That’s not my job.” This phrase communicates that the manager does not care about their employees or their job responsibilities. It sends the message that the employee is unimportant and that their job is irrelevant. This can lead to employees feeling unvalued and unmotivated. It can also cause them to feel like they are not able to come to their manager with questions or concerns, which can hurt morale and productivity. Which other phrases would you include in this list? Please take a moment to share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.