Effective Ways to Deal with an Unpredictable Schedule

Starting a new company is an exhilarating and challenging endeavor that often comes with a long list of to-dos. However, amidst the excitement and eagerness to succeed, entrepreneurs can fall into the trap of believing they must do certain things that are not actually necessary for the initial stages of their venture. So, let’s go ahead and debunk some common myths surrounding startup requirements and shed light on what new company owners don’t actually need to do. Debunking Entrepreneurial Myths: What New Company Owners Don’t Actually Need to Do Starting a new company is a daunting task. There are so many things to think about, and it can be easy to get caught up in the details. However, there are some things that entrepreneurs often believe they need to do when starting a new company that they don’t actually need to do. Like the following: Perfecting every detail. While attention to detail is crucial for any business, obsessing over perfection in every aspect of your startup can lead to unnecessary delays and increased stress. It’s important to remember that launching a new company is a dynamic process, and adjustments and improvements can be made along the way. Instead of striving for perfection from the outset, focus on building a solid foundation and refining your business as it evolves. Extensive market research. Market research is undoubtedly important for understanding your target audience, industry trends, and potential competitors. However, many entrepreneurs spend excessive time and resources conducting extensive market research before launching their businesses. While having a basic understanding of your target market is crucial, it’s equally important to take action and gain real-world feedback from customers. Embrace a “lean startup” mentality, gather feedback through early prototypes or minimum viable products, and iterate based on customer responses. Super-sized funding rounds. Securing substantial funding is often perceived as a prerequisite for launching a successful company. While funding can undoubtedly accelerate growth, it is not an absolute necessity in the early stages. In fact, focusing too much on raising funds can distract entrepreneurs from the core aspects of their business, such as developing a compelling value proposition and acquiring initial customers. By focusing on building a viable product or service and demonstrating traction, entrepreneurs can attract investors when the time is right. Over-elaborate product development. Entrepreneurs sometimes believe that their product must be fully developed and feature-rich before launching. However, this can lead to prolonged development cycles and missed market opportunities. Instead, embrace the concept of a minimum viable product (MVP) that focuses on delivering a core set of features that solve a specific problem for your target audience. Launching an MVP allows you to gather valuable customer feedback early on and iterate your product based on real-world usage. Hiring a large team. While having a talented team is essential for the long-term success of a company, hiring a large workforce from the outset is not always necessary or feasible for start-ups. In fact, it can be downright counterproductive. This is because you’ll spend a lot of time (too much time) training, onboarding, and more – all of which could be used in much more useful ways. This approach can help startups stay nimble and flexible, enabling them to adapt to changes in the market and grow more rapidly. Starting a new company is a lot of work, but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. By avoiding the things that entrepreneurs often believe they need to do when starting a new company but don’t actually need to do, you can save yourself time, money, and stress. What other things do you think entrepreneurs don’t actually need when forming a start-up? Please, go ahead and share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your input! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group to learn more about us and the services we offer.

Having a good employee who is restricted in their capabilities can be a very challenging situation. This is especially true if he or she is a valued team member, but can’t put in the hours due to certain limitations. Whether it’s a preexisting condition, and injury suffered on or off the job, you obviously have moral, ethical, and legal responsibilities to him or her. However, this doesn’t mean that they are completely protected from being terminated or having their role and/or responsibilities changed. Although this article isn’t specifically about legal ramifications, it will give you some effective tools on how to deal with this particular set of circumstances. Read on to learn more about how to deal with an employee who has limited capacity. Every Situation is Different Limited capacity can mean the number of things, including an inability to perform certain physical tasks, and other situations. But, most often it is due to a physical limitation which prevents him or her from fulfilling one or more of their responsibilities. These can range widely, from an inability to lift certain amounts, to not being able to sit for a protracted period of time. An ever persistent problem facing employers is what to do with the employee who is chronically sick or has a serious health problem. Besides the obvious issues it presents to the employer- additional strain on other employees to pick up the slack; inability to properly staff and manage work loads; basic coverage concerns- there are also potential state and federal legal ramifications if the absences are not handled and documented correctly. —HNI Risk Services Whatever the case may be, It is up to you to be as accommodating as possible, without fully compromising your company’s position. In other words, it’s best to strike a balance and find a happy medium where you can accommodate their needs while also allowing them to fulfill most or all of their work responsibilities. 3 Key Ways to Deal with an Employee with a Limited Work Capacity There’s no hard-and-fast set of rules for coping with an employee who can only work in a limited capacity. After all, no two sets of circumstances are exactly the same. But, there are some general parameters you should observe. Here are three good ways to deal with a team member who is limited in their work capacity: Gain a real understanding of the circumstances. Whether it’s a back problem, issues with a disease, or anything else, you need to have a very clear idea of what’s going on with your employee. Understand precisely what his or her limitations are and aren’t. This way, you’ll have enough information to make good decisions when it comes to his or her role and responsibilities. Make strategic concessions where necessary. Even your best employee can suffer from very unfortunate sets of circumstances and still be able to contribute to your company in a number of ways. Though it’s difficult to comprehend or even accept, it could be a detriment to your business (that is, if you insist on keeping everything the same). So, think outside the box and make strategic changes so he or she can continue to be a productive asset for your company. Realistically reassess the situation periodically. Sometimes, this can be a long-lasting situation that can go on for years. Or, it could only last for several months. Regardless, you need to take the time to reassess the situation every now and again. What other suggestions do you have? Please take a moment to share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your unique perspective; it’s greatly appreciated! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Harry Truman once said, “It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.” Ronald Reagan echoed that sentiment. JFK famously said, “…ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.” Taking credit, even when legitimately earned, doesn’t sit well with others. People often take it as pompous, even narcissistic. That’s because it simply comes across that way, even if you don’t mean it at all. That’s why two simple words can give you a glimpse into someone else’s leadership style. Language Reveals a Lot about Personality The two words that serve as warning signs of bad leadership are merely pronouns — “me” and “I.” Someone who repeatedly uses “me” and “I” are subtly (perhaps overtly) expressing their worldview. That’s right, he or she is the center around which everything revolves. Leadership is one of the most important factors determining the success of a company. Poor leadership can seriously affect employee morale and even cause the company’s bottom line to plunge. Bad leadership leads to poor employee retention and demotivates the remaining employees, causing them to be much less productive than they would otherwise be. —Houston Chronicle Small Business Okay, that’s cliche, but it exposes a hard truth. We don’t like to think of ourselves as selfish, so we also don’t like to apply that label to others. Though, when the behavior is egregious, it not only seems appropriate to think of as an undesirable quality, but almost a necessity to call out. 3 Devastatingly Poor Leadership Traits While there are certainly numerous bad leadership attributes, three are among the absolute worst. They undermine the very role of a leader. So, doing any one of them (or more) will only be counterproductive. Here three hurtful leadership characteristics to avoid all the time: Micromanaging. Unsurprisingly, this makes the top of the list. Micromanagers are among the most despised people because their behavior is completely counterproductive. Insisting on control of everything means there’s really no need for anyone else. It’s so hated, this trait ranks among the highest in dissatisfaction among people in survey after survey. It shows you have no confidence in anyone else. Plus, it proclaims you’re the only competent person in the workplace. Not recognizing others. This isn’t much different from micromanaging because it stirs up just about as much resentment. It shows a lack of care and regard for others. It also says that you have little respect for the work others work so hard to produce. If you aren’t encouraging others through recognition, you’re insulting them in more than one way. Failing to share information. When you aren’t transparent and open about what’s going on or what’s expected, you’re effectively sabotaging anyone without that information. “To be unclear is to be unkind” the saying goes. It speaks volumes because keeping too much too close to the vest shows a real lack of trust. Without trust, there’s no way to have a working relationship. What other signs tip you off to a bad leader? Please share your thoughts and experiences by commenting! Others can greatly benefit from what you have to contribute. Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.