Any entrepreneur struggling with this situation surely cringes at the thought of sacking a team member, even if that employee is messing up everything they touch. It’s a tough decision, but the business must come first, or it could suffer irreparable damage. So, the question becomes, is it smart to hire a replacement and then separate the underperformer, or would it be better to offload the problem and then bring in someone competent to fill the gap? Well, it’s not easy to answer and arguably even more difficult to execute.

“A-players hire A-players; B-players hire C-players.” This quote is often attributed to Steve Jobs, and whether he coined the phrase or not misses its point. The sentiment is obviously about a fundamental strategy to succeed in business. So, many entrepreneurs subscribe to this belief, thinking it’s practically infallible. However, that’s simply not the case because plenty of business owners have discovered that chasing top talent is the proverbial carrot on a stick. Instead, they adopt an alternative approach and seek out “average” individuals instead. Here’s why.