Best Ways to Manage Your Time and Energy

Having a good employee who is restricted in their capabilities can be a very challenging situation. This is especially true if he or she is a valued team member, but can’t put in the hours due to certain limitations. Whether it’s a preexisting condition, and injury suffered on or off the job, you obviously have moral, ethical, and legal responsibilities to him or her. However, this doesn’t mean that they are completely protected from being terminated or having their role and/or responsibilities changed. Although this article isn’t specifically about legal ramifications, it will give you some effective tools on how to deal with this particular set of circumstances. Read on to learn more about how to deal with an employee who has limited capacity. Every Situation is Different Limited capacity can mean the number of things, including an inability to perform certain physical tasks, and other situations. But, most often it is due to a physical limitation which prevents him or her from fulfilling one or more of their responsibilities. These can range widely, from an inability to lift certain amounts, to not being able to sit for a protracted period of time. An ever persistent problem facing employers is what to do with the employee who is chronically sick or has a serious health problem. Besides the obvious issues it presents to the employer- additional strain on other employees to pick up the slack; inability to properly staff and manage work loads; basic coverage concerns- there are also potential state and federal legal ramifications if the absences are not handled and documented correctly. —HNI Risk Services Whatever the case may be, It is up to you to be as accommodating as possible, without fully compromising your company’s position. In other words, it’s best to strike a balance and find a happy medium where you can accommodate their needs while also allowing them to fulfill most or all of their work responsibilities. 3 Key Ways to Deal with an Employee with a Limited Work Capacity There’s no hard-and-fast set of rules for coping with an employee who can only work in a limited capacity. After all, no two sets of circumstances are exactly the same. But, there are some general parameters you should observe. Here are three good ways to deal with a team member who is limited in their work capacity: Gain a real understanding of the circumstances. Whether it’s a back problem, issues with a disease, or anything else, you need to have a very clear idea of what’s going on with your employee. Understand precisely what his or her limitations are and aren’t. This way, you’ll have enough information to make good decisions when it comes to his or her role and responsibilities. Make strategic concessions where necessary. Even your best employee can suffer from very unfortunate sets of circumstances and still be able to contribute to your company in a number of ways. Though it’s difficult to comprehend or even accept, it could be a detriment to your business (that is, if you insist on keeping everything the same). So, think outside the box and make strategic changes so he or she can continue to be a productive asset for your company. Realistically reassess the situation periodically. Sometimes, this can be a long-lasting situation that can go on for years. Or, it could only last for several months. Regardless, you need to take the time to reassess the situation every now and again. What other suggestions do you have? Please take a moment to share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your unique perspective; it’s greatly appreciated! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

What a Disgruntled Ex-Employee Who Cost a Company $678,000 Can Teach All Business Owners In early June, Kandula Nagaraju, a 39-year-old former National Computer Systems employee from India, received a two-year, eight-month prison sentence for unauthorized access and deletion of 180 test servers at his previous workplace. Despite being terminated in October 2022 due to performance issues, Nagaraju retained access to company systems. He used this access to develop and execute scripts that deleted the servers. This action cost NCS approximately $678,000 to rectify. Fortunately, his nefarious deeds did not compromise sensitive data as the servers were isolated and used for app testing. But, the company still suffered an enormous financial loss. Plus, things could have been a lot worse. This single case serves as a critical reminder: ex-employees can still be a liability, and if they maintain their insider access, they can exploit said access to inflict extensive damage. Not only monetarily, but on a much wider and more consequential scale. So harmful, that it could bring a company down and ruin its reputation to the point of no return. Why Businesses Should Always Delete the Credentials of Former Team Members Sadly, Nagaraju is just one example of many. Several companies have suffered immensely – but unnecessarily – simply because those organizations did not take the proper steps to protect themselves. Instead, they were complacent or too late to act and the results were disastrous. Because of these instances, businesses should always remove ex-employee credentials to keep their corporate data and work product secure for several reasons: Data security. Ex-employees may still have access to sensitive company information, such as customer data, trade secrets, or financial information. Removing their access ensures that this data remains secure and is not accessed or misused by unauthorized individuals. Prevent unauthorized access. Even if an ex-employee has left the company – even on good terms – there is always a risk that they could use their access to the company’s systems to make changes or access data without approval. Removing their credentials prevents this from happening. Compliance. Many industries have regulations that require companies to protect sensitive data. By removing ex-employee credentials, companies can ensure they are meeting these compliance requirements. Insider threats. Ex-employees may be disgruntled or may have left the company under less-than-ideal circumstances. They could potentially use their access to company systems to sabotage the company or steal data. Removing their credentials helps to mitigate this risk. Avoid confusion. If an ex-employee’s credentials are not removed, it can lead to confusion about who has access to what. This can make it more difficult to manage access to systems and data. And last but not least, data breach prevention. If an ex-employee’s credentials are compromised, it could lead to a data breach. Removing their credentials helps to prevent this. By deleting their access, companies have less risk of sensitive information getting out into the public domain. Because once that data is out, it’s up for grabs for anyone to capture it. So, businesses of all sizes should have a process in place to address such security issues. When an employee leaves the company voluntarily or a team member is terminated, that person’s credentialed access should immediately be removed. Additionally, steps must be taken to fill that new void to ensure workflow continues virtually uninterrupted in order to meet benchmarks and deadlines. Moreover, to keep proprietary data safe. Want to Accomplish More? Do you want your company to grow faster and earn more while you spend more time with your family doing all the things you started your business to do? We can make that dream a reality. Give us 30 minutes and we will show you how to get your life back. Skeptical? Good! Put us to the test. You can call us for your free appointment at (602) 541-1760, or, if you prefer,