With the roll-backs of local, state, and federal COVID-19 restrictions, businesses are attempting to return to a state of normalcy. But, reinstating pre-pandemic conditions isn’t as simple as they ought to be, and too many entrepreneurs are experiencing such a cruel reality. So, some are experimenting with a hybrid solution: a combination of work-from-home or WFH and on-site business operation. Sure, it certainly sounds like a logical solution. But, every solution breeds new problems. Meaning, there are distinct disadvantages to adopting a WFH and on-site business model. Biggest Hybrid Workplace Advantages Obviously, corporations around the world wouldn’t put a hybrid model in-place unless it had substantial benefits. And, there are some compelling reasons, like the potential of increased productivity via a customizable schedule. After all, happy employees are more productive and that’s certainly good for the bottom line. Then, there’s the morale boost which comes from being able to choose from WFH and on-site. Employees cherish the freedom and that too, helps to boost both productivity and morale. What many companies are converging on is a mixture of remote working and traditional office working, known as the hybrid workplace. A hybrid workplace exists when a business allows their employees to work either remotely or from the office. In a typical hybrid workplace, employees have the choice of working in a central office, working from home, or splitting their time between the two. —WeWork Ideas Blog Additionally, it can help to reduce operating costs, which decrease with the lessened need of supporting individuals constantly on-site. Moreover, it allows employees to avoid toxic situations. For instance, two or more employees who don’t get along very well in-person can find relief by not having to be in close proximity. 4 Issues with a WFH and On-Site Hybrid Business Operation While a hybrid operation might sound like a perfect answer, that just isn’t the case. Unfortunately, there are big potential problems with adopting a hybrid model, as the following issues might present: Managing a hybrid team is very difficult. Anyone with experience in managing a team is familiar with the vast time and effort that goes into making it work. Now, add-in a bunch of other variables that weren’t present before and it’s easy to imagine just how more difficult or nightmarish managing people in totally different physical locations is in reality. Some WFH employees will take advantage. Put this problem in the all-too-obvious column: some employees will exploit the new policies to their own personal advantage, even if it results in harming others and/or the company. While it’s not something you might relish thinking about, it is most definitely a possibility or perhaps, even a probability. A hybrid scenario can easily foster resentment. Another potential problem is along the same lines as the one above — that one or more employees will gain a sense of others’ nefarious behaviors regarding the hybrid operation. That could very well cause resentment to rear its ugly head. Not everyone will contribute the same amount. Expounding on the last two possible issues, is the real possibility one or more employees will shuffle responsibilities off their own shoulders and onto their coworkers through a form of sleight of hand. What other suggestions do you have to deal with potential work-from-home issues? Please take a few minutes to share your thoughts and experiences. Perhaps others can benefit from your unique perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

An exit interview is conducted for two principal purposes. The first is to learn about the soon-to-be former employee’s experiences at the company. The second is to determine the reason he or she is leaving. Those are pretty straightforward and can provide valuable insight into how a business operates from an employee’s point of view. This is why large corporations establish these separation procedures. However, even small businesses can take advantage of what exit interviews have to offer. Downsides to Holding Exit Interviews Now, there are of course pros and cons to conducting exit interviews. The first and perhaps most obvious is that a future former employee May be unwilling and/or apprehensive about the possibility of burning bridges. In other words, you might not get the unfettered truth to every answer. Plus, it’s possible the person will go out of his or her way not to offer honest answers. Then, there’s also the possibility he or she will hold back information and that of course can undermine the entire exercise. Exit interviews are conducted to generate feedback from employees with the goal to lower employee turnover rate, raise employee retention, and improves aspects of the organization as a whole. After conducting the interviews and reviewing the data, organizations will use the employees’ suggestions to create a better organization for which their employees want to work and succeed. —Work Institute.com What’s more, if you do get the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, your action on the other side can be very detrimental. After all, the departing employee might provide valuable insight into correcting certain issues or problems within his or her position that could benefit his or her successor and/or, the business as a whole. Failing to apply solutions could result in remaining employees knowing that nothing was done, and that can be quite damaging to morale. 3 Biggest Exit Interview Benefits Obviously, companies conduct interviews as part of their business practices for good reason. And, as mentioned above, even small businesses can reap the same benefits. Here are the biggest advantages of conducting exit interviews: Gain inside perspective. Managers, administrators, and owners are routinely surprised by what they learn through exit interviews. Because they are in charge at the top, they believe they have some sort of omniscient knowledge, but that’s certainly not always true. In fact, this is why third-party HR services offer exit interviews since they understand through experience that the upper echelons of companies aren’t always aware of everything that’s actually going on. Discover unknown issues. Along the same line, it’s not only learning the intricate dynamics or the minutiae of a certain position, but also the problems and issues that affect said position being vacated. It’s not at all unusual for the exit interviewee to reveal certain points of friction or areas of frustration with the position they are leaving. This too is very valuable information and gives the company and opportunity to make key changes. Increase employee retention. One of the main reasons companies conduct exit interviews is to gain knowledge of the benefits listed above in order to enact reforms or policy initiatives that serve the employees better. By doing so, the businesses are able to improve on their operational practices and that can also benefit other areas, such as employee cohesion, morale, and productivity. What other advantages do exit interviews offer? Please take a brief moment to leave a comment and share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your input. Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.