Business Education

Have You Tried the Discarded Napkin Test?

Have you tried the discarded napkin test? Perhaps you’ve never heard of it because it isn’t an actual thing. But, this simple sociological experiment does reveal some fascinating insight into how we perceive others and gauge various environments. Don’t bother Googling it, you won’t find any on-point results. However, that doesn’t mean it’s not useful.

Try the Discarded Napkin Test for Yourself

The discarded napkin test is a simple one. And, it clearly demonstrates the importance of appearance. Here it is: go into a casual restaurant prior to the lunch hour rush. Crumple a clean napkin and place it on a clean but empty table. Sit nearby and watch how many people past the “tainted” table up for another. Eventually, if there’s no more tables available, someone will muster the courage to clean it off. Or, give into the frustration of the limited seating options and swipe it to the floor.

Many workplaces have dress codes, particularly workplaces in industries in which image is highly valued and workplaces in which employees have regular face-to-face contact with customers. Whether you are considering setting a dress code for an existing workplace or trying to decide whether your new retail store will require employees to adhere to a dress code, consider the broad benefits and potential drawbacks — like backlash from casual-dressing employees — of such a move. —Houston Chronicle

The point is, people will choose to sit elsewhere even when the only flaw with a table is a discarded napkin. That’s it. Its unpleasing appearance is enough to turn off person after person. Although a bit strange, it’s true. And, it begs the question — are employee dress codes good or bad?

Employee Dress Codes Pros and Cons

Okay, so there are a number of dumb office rules that drive employees crazy. But, some make sense to enforce. When it comes to employee dress codes, it’s not always cut and dry. This means, while an employee dress code can actually be a good policy, it can also be a bad idea. Here are some employee dress code pros and cons to consider:

Pro — professional appearance. The single biggest benefit of an employee dress code is it provides a professional appearance. It’s especially useful in retail settings and offices. In the former, uniforms distinguish employees while the latter, business casual provides a professional yet laid back experience.
Con — stifles personal style. Although a dress code does provide a more professional experience, it also can stifle personal style. That can mean rebellion, particularly in an office setting. Team members might feel an imposition and possibly a bit untrusted.
Pro — provides “uniform” experience. Of course, you’d like your business to send a uniform message, which uniforms undeniably provide. However, in an office setting, this is a little more problematic. But, broad rules with clear prohibitions usually works well.
Con — needs consistent policing. Now, the biggest downside of any dress code is the need to police it constantly and consistently. Otherwise, it’s just a suggestion and not enforced policy. At least, that’s the way employees will feel.

What other pros and cons of employee dress codes have you experienced? Do you favor a strict dress code or a loose one? Please share your thoughts and experiences by commenting!

Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Like this article?

3 Necessary Replacement Manager Qualities

July 3, 2021 No Comments

Replacing a manager in any size business presents a number of challenges. It’s not just finding the person with the right skill set, or the most experience, or even the best aptitude for the position, but all of these and more. Unfortunately, too many administrators and entrepreneurs only look at these types of qualities. They fail to factor in other intangibles that would benefit their team members the most. Read on to learn about the three most important qualities of a replacement manager. Why Past Job Performance is No Guarantee of Future Success You’ve no doubt heard or experienced two different cliches: that past performance of an investment is no guarantee of its future result, and the Peter Principle (the phenomenon of people rising to their highest level of incompetence). Unfortunately, this is where many administrators and business owners go wrong. They mistakenly believe that an individual’s past performance is indicative of future results. But, this just isn’t true. Bad managers cost businesses billions of dollars each year, and having too many of them can bring down a company. The only defense against this massive problem is a good offense, because when companies get these decisions wrong, nothing fixes it. Businesses that get it right, however, and hire managers based on talent will thrive and gain a significant competitive advantage. —Harvard Business Review Sure, it’s absolutely necessary to look at a candidate’s previous experience and performance. It’s also just as necessary to rely at least somewhat on their proven skill set and untapped potential. However, this isn’t likely to give you a good overall evaluation of how he or she will fit into his or her new role. 3 Important Replacement Manager Traits One of the most difficult aspects of replacing a manager in any type of business is how he or she will be received by the team members he or she will lead. So, ask yourself if potential candidates have the following qualities: Empathetic ears. There are many different kinds of managers out there, and some of them are a better fit for a promotion or lateral move than others. Depending on their new responsibilities, you most definitely want them to be ambitious and take ownership of their responsibilities. Equally so, it’s critical to have a manager who truly listens to their team members because this will be the perception employees have of the company overall. Decision confidence. Obviously, if someone has all the experience and potential to move up or across, he or she should likewise possess a strong self confidence. In other words, a manager who doesn’t always have to rely on higher ups to make decisions, particularly ones that are relatively small. After all, you don’t want to put someone in a management role who just can’t make up their mind and constantly comes to you for those very reasons. Golden rule follower. If there’s one thing that rank-and-file team members despise the most, it is managers who cannot follow their own rules. Hypocrisy, double standards, and negative traits such as these will quickly erode away employee morale and productivity. Nobody performs well under such types of management, because it is so counterproductive by its nature. What other suggestions do you have for replacing a manager as a business owner? Please take a moment to share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your unique perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

What a Disgruntled Ex-Employee Who Cost a Company $678,000 Can Teach All Business Owners

June 26, 2024 No Comments

What a Disgruntled Ex-Employee Who Cost a Company $678,000 Can Teach All Business Owners In early June, Kandula Nagaraju, a 39-year-old former National Computer Systems employee from India, received a two-year, eight-month prison sentence for unauthorized access and deletion of 180 test servers at his previous workplace. Despite being terminated in October 2022 due to performance issues, Nagaraju retained access to company systems. He used this access to develop and execute scripts that deleted the servers. This action cost NCS approximately $678,000 to rectify. Fortunately, his nefarious deeds did not compromise sensitive data as the servers were isolated and used for app testing. But, the company still suffered an enormous financial loss. Plus, things could have been a lot worse. This single case serves as a critical reminder: ex-employees can still be a liability, and if they maintain their insider access, they can exploit said access to inflict extensive damage. Not only monetarily, but on a much wider and more consequential scale. So harmful, that it could bring a company down and ruin its reputation to the point of no return. Why Businesses Should Always Delete the Credentials of Former Team Members Sadly, Nagaraju is just one example of many. Several companies have suffered immensely – but unnecessarily – simply because those organizations did not take the proper steps to protect themselves. Instead, they were complacent or too late to act and the results were disastrous. Because of these instances, businesses should always remove ex-employee credentials to keep their corporate data and work product secure for several reasons: Data security. Ex-employees may still have access to sensitive company information, such as customer data, trade secrets, or financial information. Removing their access ensures that this data remains secure and is not accessed or misused by unauthorized individuals. Prevent unauthorized access. Even if an ex-employee has left the company – even on good terms – there is always a risk that they could use their access to the company’s systems to make changes or access data without approval. Removing their credentials prevents this from happening. Compliance. Many industries have regulations that require companies to protect sensitive data. By removing ex-employee credentials, companies can ensure they are meeting these compliance requirements. Insider threats. Ex-employees may be disgruntled or may have left the company under less-than-ideal circumstances. They could potentially use their access to company systems to sabotage the company or steal data. Removing their credentials helps to mitigate this risk. Avoid confusion. If an ex-employee’s credentials are not removed, it can lead to confusion about who has access to what. This can make it more difficult to manage access to systems and data. And last but not least, data breach prevention. If an ex-employee’s credentials are compromised, it could lead to a data breach. Removing their credentials helps to prevent this. By deleting their access, companies have less risk of sensitive information getting out into the public domain. Because once that data is out, it’s up for grabs for anyone to capture it. So, businesses of all sizes should have a process in place to address such security issues. When an employee leaves the company voluntarily or a team member is terminated, that person’s credentialed access should immediately be removed. Additionally, steps must be taken to fill that new void to ensure workflow continues virtually uninterrupted in order to meet benchmarks and deadlines. Moreover, to keep proprietary data safe. Want to Accomplish More? Do you want your company to grow faster and earn more while you spend more time with your family doing all the things you started your business to do? We can make that dream a reality. Give us 30 minutes and we will show you how to get your life back. Skeptical? Good! Put us to the test. You can call us for your free appointment at (602) 541-1760, or, if you prefer,

Here’s What You Need to Know About the ATT and Apple 5GE Sleight of Hand

February 14, 2019 No Comments

In case you haven’t yet heard, a new type of communication technology is on its way — 5G. It’s the fifth-generation cellular system, coming to replace 4G, the fourth-generation. And, it promises to deliver a whole new level of speed. Some experts forecasts speeds of 100x greater. In fact, it’s so fast, the wireless connections will easily rival hard-wired connectivity of the old system. So, it’s no wonder carriers and handheld device manufacturers are ready to get it out into the marketplace. Trouble is, it will take some time to roll out. But, that isn’t stopping two companies from getting-in on the action ahead of time. What Consumers Need to Know about the AT&T and Apple 5GE Marketing Campaign Recently, AT&T started to display “5GE” on select Android phones. Then, this week, Apple joined in, doing the same for some of its iOS devices. The problem is, “5GE” isn’t 5G tech. It stands for “5G Evolution.” This sleight of hand isn’t new. We want results, and we want them now. Your customers want the same thing and are willing to pay for it. A temptation could arise to promise them quick results when you know that’s not going to be the case. This kind of short-sighted thinking hurts your business in the long run. —Entrepreneur.com Companies have done this type of thing before. Of course, it’s misleading, to say the least. Customers might think they’re on a real 5G network, via a real 5G device. Although, the move hasn’t gone unnoticed. Rival T-Mobile posted a short video mocking AT&T, with a caption reading “didn’t realize it was this easy, brb updating.” Others have also joined in, rightly criticizing the move. 3 Real Costs of Deceptive Business Practices Now, the word will most definitely spread and people will catch-on to the ruse. So, it’s important to look at the impact of such misleading marketing and what it can really do. Here are the three biggest effects of deceptive marketing: Customers suffer. Needless to say, customers obviously suffer because such tactics instill a strong sense of distrust. If a business puts out misleading claims, when discovered, customers won’t trust it. What’s more, they’ll also become skeptical about other things. Businesses suffer. While the sleight of hand might payoff in the short-term, the long-term consequences can be quite severe. Word of mouth will spread and that could prove enough to bring about the demise of a business. Employees suffer, too. When a business tries to fool its customers, the employees will take the brunt of the blow-back. It’s not fair for employees to suffer undeserved consequences. What else would you add to the list? Please share your thoughts and experiences by commenting! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.