How to Know when It’s Time to Walk Away from a Business

Inflation in the United States is at its highest level in 31 years, according to the Wall Street Journal. Currently, it’s measuring around 6%, and complicating matters more is supply chain issues, along with shortages in key materials, as well as labor availability. Due to these factors, businesses are faced with the decision to raise prices. Although practically any business owner would resist, this just isn’t a sound strategy. When a company’s costs rise, it must pass on at least a portion to consumers. If businesses don’t raise prices, they obviously reduce their margins, thereby reducing their revenues. So, do small businesses deal with inflation? How Small Businesses can Deal with Inflation Fortunately, there are a few key strategies you can employ to help your company through an inflationary cycle. One step you can take is to offer bulk discounts on the products you sell, incentivizing your customers to purchase more in exchange for paying less overall. Another thing that you can do is to use the same strategy for wholesale vendors, asking them for a slightly higher discount in exchange for purchasing more inventory, or materials and supplies. The PPI — producer price index– measures the prices of goods immediately postproduction and serves as a critical indicator of the pressure facing companies. Companies that weathered previous storms the best took decisive steps to counter rising inflation by pushing through price increases consistent with PPI — but that alone was not enough. —Havard Business Review Small businesses can also help to offset inflationary pressures by scheduling jobs further into the future. Since materials are more scarce at the moment, this might not be a viable strategy. Of course, this does come with a good deal of risk, because you don’t have a crystal ball into what will unfold over the next several months. Yet another strategy for coping with inflation is to move to alternative materials and supplies that cost a little less. But, be aware this might also mean having to settle for a lesser quality product. 3 Biggest Inflation Price-Adjustment Mistakes to Avoid If these strategies aren’t enough or don’t appeal to you, there are definitely things you should avoid doing. Because any one of these will likely be extremely costly in one way or another. Here are the three most dangerous mistakes businesses really need to avoid in their inflation adjustment pricing: Apologizing. Sure, it’s human nature to empathize. But, you’re not the driving force in rising prices, nor are you in control of the elements that are causing inflation to rise. Although it’s tempting to apologize for having to charge more, it puts you in a position of weakness and can easily lead to you reducing prices at a time where it’s just not feasible. Overcharging. Obviously, price gouging is illegal. But, charging more (particularly above the new, higher market rate) in order to cover your rising costs and increase your margin at the same time is not advisable. Doing this will only result in driving customers to look for less expensive alternatives in your competitors and leave you with a guilty conscience. Undercharging. This is perhaps the biggest temptation small business owners face during inflationary periods. They empathize with their customers, being affected in their own personal lives too. So, they decide to keep their prices the same or only raise them as little as possible, thereby cutting into their margins. While customers will certainly appreciate the break, it could very well become a self-inflicted wound that leads to ruin. What other suggestions do you have for dealing with inflation price adjustments? Please take a brief moment to leave a comment and share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your strategies. Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

With the roll-backs of local, state, and federal COVID-19 restrictions, businesses are attempting to return to a state of normalcy. But, reinstating pre-pandemic conditions isn’t as simple as they ought to be, and too many entrepreneurs are experiencing such a cruel reality. So, some are experimenting with a hybrid solution: a combination of work-from-home or WFH and on-site business operation. Sure, it certainly sounds like a logical solution. But, every solution breeds new problems. Meaning, there are distinct disadvantages to adopting a WFH and on-site business model. Biggest Hybrid Workplace Advantages Obviously, corporations around the world wouldn’t put a hybrid model in-place unless it had substantial benefits. And, there are some compelling reasons, like the potential of increased productivity via a customizable schedule. After all, happy employees are more productive and that’s certainly good for the bottom line. Then, there’s the morale boost which comes from being able to choose from WFH and on-site. Employees cherish the freedom and that too, helps to boost both productivity and morale. What many companies are converging on is a mixture of remote working and traditional office working, known as the hybrid workplace. A hybrid workplace exists when a business allows their employees to work either remotely or from the office. In a typical hybrid workplace, employees have the choice of working in a central office, working from home, or splitting their time between the two. —WeWork Ideas Blog Additionally, it can help to reduce operating costs, which decrease with the lessened need of supporting individuals constantly on-site. Moreover, it allows employees to avoid toxic situations. For instance, two or more employees who don’t get along very well in-person can find relief by not having to be in close proximity. 4 Issues with a WFH and On-Site Hybrid Business Operation While a hybrid operation might sound like a perfect answer, that just isn’t the case. Unfortunately, there are big potential problems with adopting a hybrid model, as the following issues might present: Managing a hybrid team is very difficult. Anyone with experience in managing a team is familiar with the vast time and effort that goes into making it work. Now, add-in a bunch of other variables that weren’t present before and it’s easy to imagine just how more difficult or nightmarish managing people in totally different physical locations is in reality. Some WFH employees will take advantage. Put this problem in the all-too-obvious column: some employees will exploit the new policies to their own personal advantage, even if it results in harming others and/or the company. While it’s not something you might relish thinking about, it is most definitely a possibility or perhaps, even a probability. A hybrid scenario can easily foster resentment. Another potential problem is along the same lines as the one above — that one or more employees will gain a sense of others’ nefarious behaviors regarding the hybrid operation. That could very well cause resentment to rear its ugly head. Not everyone will contribute the same amount. Expounding on the last two possible issues, is the real possibility one or more employees will shuffle responsibilities off their own shoulders and onto their coworkers through a form of sleight of hand. What other suggestions do you have to deal with potential work-from-home issues? Please take a few minutes to share your thoughts and experiences. Perhaps others can benefit from your unique perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

What a Disgruntled Ex-Employee Who Cost a Company $678,000 Can Teach All Business Owners In early June, Kandula Nagaraju, a 39-year-old former National Computer Systems employee from India, received a two-year, eight-month prison sentence for unauthorized access and deletion of 180 test servers at his previous workplace. Despite being terminated in October 2022 due to performance issues, Nagaraju retained access to company systems. He used this access to develop and execute scripts that deleted the servers. This action cost NCS approximately $678,000 to rectify. Fortunately, his nefarious deeds did not compromise sensitive data as the servers were isolated and used for app testing. But, the company still suffered an enormous financial loss. Plus, things could have been a lot worse. This single case serves as a critical reminder: ex-employees can still be a liability, and if they maintain their insider access, they can exploit said access to inflict extensive damage. Not only monetarily, but on a much wider and more consequential scale. So harmful, that it could bring a company down and ruin its reputation to the point of no return. Why Businesses Should Always Delete the Credentials of Former Team Members Sadly, Nagaraju is just one example of many. Several companies have suffered immensely – but unnecessarily – simply because those organizations did not take the proper steps to protect themselves. Instead, they were complacent or too late to act and the results were disastrous. Because of these instances, businesses should always remove ex-employee credentials to keep their corporate data and work product secure for several reasons: Data security. Ex-employees may still have access to sensitive company information, such as customer data, trade secrets, or financial information. Removing their access ensures that this data remains secure and is not accessed or misused by unauthorized individuals. Prevent unauthorized access. Even if an ex-employee has left the company – even on good terms – there is always a risk that they could use their access to the company’s systems to make changes or access data without approval. Removing their credentials prevents this from happening. Compliance. Many industries have regulations that require companies to protect sensitive data. By removing ex-employee credentials, companies can ensure they are meeting these compliance requirements. Insider threats. Ex-employees may be disgruntled or may have left the company under less-than-ideal circumstances. They could potentially use their access to company systems to sabotage the company or steal data. Removing their credentials helps to mitigate this risk. Avoid confusion. If an ex-employee’s credentials are not removed, it can lead to confusion about who has access to what. This can make it more difficult to manage access to systems and data. And last but not least, data breach prevention. If an ex-employee’s credentials are compromised, it could lead to a data breach. Removing their credentials helps to prevent this. By deleting their access, companies have less risk of sensitive information getting out into the public domain. Because once that data is out, it’s up for grabs for anyone to capture it. So, businesses of all sizes should have a process in place to address such security issues. When an employee leaves the company voluntarily or a team member is terminated, that person’s credentialed access should immediately be removed. Additionally, steps must be taken to fill that new void to ensure workflow continues virtually uninterrupted in order to meet benchmarks and deadlines. Moreover, to keep proprietary data safe. Want to Accomplish More? Do you want your company to grow faster and earn more while you spend more time with your family doing all the things you started your business to do? We can make that dream a reality. Give us 30 minutes and we will show you how to get your life back. Skeptical? Good! Put us to the test. You can call us for your free appointment at (602) 541-1760, or, if you prefer,