Guest Post: The Best Advice for Retirees Aiming to Start a New Business

Starting a new company is an exhilarating and challenging endeavor that often comes with a long list of to-dos. However, amidst the excitement and eagerness to succeed, entrepreneurs can fall into the trap of believing they must do certain things that are not actually necessary for the initial stages of their venture. So, let’s go ahead and debunk some common myths surrounding startup requirements and shed light on what new company owners don’t actually need to do. Debunking Entrepreneurial Myths: What New Company Owners Don’t Actually Need to Do Starting a new company is a daunting task. There are so many things to think about, and it can be easy to get caught up in the details. However, there are some things that entrepreneurs often believe they need to do when starting a new company that they don’t actually need to do. Like the following: Perfecting every detail. While attention to detail is crucial for any business, obsessing over perfection in every aspect of your startup can lead to unnecessary delays and increased stress. It’s important to remember that launching a new company is a dynamic process, and adjustments and improvements can be made along the way. Instead of striving for perfection from the outset, focus on building a solid foundation and refining your business as it evolves. Extensive market research. Market research is undoubtedly important for understanding your target audience, industry trends, and potential competitors. However, many entrepreneurs spend excessive time and resources conducting extensive market research before launching their businesses. While having a basic understanding of your target market is crucial, it’s equally important to take action and gain real-world feedback from customers. Embrace a “lean startup” mentality, gather feedback through early prototypes or minimum viable products, and iterate based on customer responses. Super-sized funding rounds. Securing substantial funding is often perceived as a prerequisite for launching a successful company. While funding can undoubtedly accelerate growth, it is not an absolute necessity in the early stages. In fact, focusing too much on raising funds can distract entrepreneurs from the core aspects of their business, such as developing a compelling value proposition and acquiring initial customers. By focusing on building a viable product or service and demonstrating traction, entrepreneurs can attract investors when the time is right. Over-elaborate product development. Entrepreneurs sometimes believe that their product must be fully developed and feature-rich before launching. However, this can lead to prolonged development cycles and missed market opportunities. Instead, embrace the concept of a minimum viable product (MVP) that focuses on delivering a core set of features that solve a specific problem for your target audience. Launching an MVP allows you to gather valuable customer feedback early on and iterate your product based on real-world usage. Hiring a large team. While having a talented team is essential for the long-term success of a company, hiring a large workforce from the outset is not always necessary or feasible for start-ups. In fact, it can be downright counterproductive. This is because you’ll spend a lot of time (too much time) training, onboarding, and more – all of which could be used in much more useful ways. This approach can help startups stay nimble and flexible, enabling them to adapt to changes in the market and grow more rapidly. Starting a new company is a lot of work, but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. By avoiding the things that entrepreneurs often believe they need to do when starting a new company but don’t actually need to do, you can save yourself time, money, and stress. What other things do you think entrepreneurs don’t actually need when forming a start-up? Please, go ahead and share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your input! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group to learn more about us and the services we offer.

With the roll-backs of local, state, and federal COVID-19 restrictions, businesses are attempting to return to a state of normalcy. But, reinstating pre-pandemic conditions isn’t as simple as they ought to be, and too many entrepreneurs are experiencing such a cruel reality. So, some are experimenting with a hybrid solution: a combination of work-from-home or WFH and on-site business operation. Sure, it certainly sounds like a logical solution. But, every solution breeds new problems. Meaning, there are distinct disadvantages to adopting a WFH and on-site business model. Biggest Hybrid Workplace Advantages Obviously, corporations around the world wouldn’t put a hybrid model in-place unless it had substantial benefits. And, there are some compelling reasons, like the potential of increased productivity via a customizable schedule. After all, happy employees are more productive and that’s certainly good for the bottom line. Then, there’s the morale boost which comes from being able to choose from WFH and on-site. Employees cherish the freedom and that too, helps to boost both productivity and morale. What many companies are converging on is a mixture of remote working and traditional office working, known as the hybrid workplace. A hybrid workplace exists when a business allows their employees to work either remotely or from the office. In a typical hybrid workplace, employees have the choice of working in a central office, working from home, or splitting their time between the two. —WeWork Ideas Blog Additionally, it can help to reduce operating costs, which decrease with the lessened need of supporting individuals constantly on-site. Moreover, it allows employees to avoid toxic situations. For instance, two or more employees who don’t get along very well in-person can find relief by not having to be in close proximity. 4 Issues with a WFH and On-Site Hybrid Business Operation While a hybrid operation might sound like a perfect answer, that just isn’t the case. Unfortunately, there are big potential problems with adopting a hybrid model, as the following issues might present: Managing a hybrid team is very difficult. Anyone with experience in managing a team is familiar with the vast time and effort that goes into making it work. Now, add-in a bunch of other variables that weren’t present before and it’s easy to imagine just how more difficult or nightmarish managing people in totally different physical locations is in reality. Some WFH employees will take advantage. Put this problem in the all-too-obvious column: some employees will exploit the new policies to their own personal advantage, even if it results in harming others and/or the company. While it’s not something you might relish thinking about, it is most definitely a possibility or perhaps, even a probability. A hybrid scenario can easily foster resentment. Another potential problem is along the same lines as the one above — that one or more employees will gain a sense of others’ nefarious behaviors regarding the hybrid operation. That could very well cause resentment to rear its ugly head. Not everyone will contribute the same amount. Expounding on the last two possible issues, is the real possibility one or more employees will shuffle responsibilities off their own shoulders and onto their coworkers through a form of sleight of hand. What other suggestions do you have to deal with potential work-from-home issues? Please take a few minutes to share your thoughts and experiences. Perhaps others can benefit from your unique perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.