4 Big Problems with a WFH and On-Site Hybrid Business Operation

With the roll-backs of local, state, and federal COVID-19 restrictions, businesses are attempting to return to a state of normalcy. But, reinstating pre-pandemic conditions isn’t as simple as they ought to be, and too many entrepreneurs are experiencing such a cruel reality. So, some are experimenting with a hybrid solution: a combination of work-from-home or WFH and on-site business operation. Sure, it certainly sounds like a logical solution. But, every solution breeds new problems. Meaning, there are distinct disadvantages to adopting a WFH and on-site business model.

Biggest Hybrid Workplace Advantages

Obviously, corporations around the world wouldn’t put a hybrid model in-place unless it had substantial benefits. And, there are some compelling reasons, like the potential of increased productivity via a customizable schedule. After all, happy employees are more productive and that’s certainly good for the bottom line. Then, there’s the morale boost which comes from being able to choose from WFH and on-site. Employees cherish the freedom and that too, helps to boost both productivity and morale.
What many companies are converging on is a mixture of remote working and traditional office working, known as the hybrid workplace. A hybrid workplace exists when a business allows their employees to work either remotely or from the office. In a typical hybrid workplace, employees have the choice of working in a central office, working from home, or splitting their time between the two. —WeWork Ideas Blog
Additionally, it can help to reduce operating costs, which decrease with the lessened need of supporting individuals constantly on-site. Moreover, it allows employees to avoid toxic situations. For instance, two or more employees who don’t get along very well in-person can find relief by not having to be in close proximity.

4 Issues with a WFH and On-Site Hybrid Business Operation

While a hybrid operation might sound like a perfect answer, that just isn’t the case. Unfortunately, there are big potential problems with adopting a hybrid model, as the following issues might present:
  • Managing a hybrid team is very difficult. Anyone with experience in managing a team is familiar with the vast time and effort that goes into making it work. Now, add-in a bunch of other variables that weren’t present before and it’s easy to imagine just how more difficult or nightmarish managing people in totally different physical locations is in reality.
  • Some WFH employees will take advantage. Put this problem in the all-too-obvious column: some employees will exploit the new policies to their own personal advantage, even if it results in harming others and/or the company. While it’s not something you might relish thinking about, it is most definitely a possibility or perhaps, even a probability.
  • A hybrid scenario can easily foster resentment. Another potential problem is along the same lines as the one above — that one or more employees will gain a sense of others’ nefarious behaviors regarding the hybrid operation. That could very well cause resentment to rear its ugly head.
  • Not everyone will contribute the same amount. Expounding on the last two possible issues, is the real possibility one or more employees will shuffle responsibilities off their own shoulders and onto their coworkers through a form of sleight of hand.
What other suggestions do you have to deal with potential work-from-home issues? Please take a few minutes to share your thoughts and experiences. Perhaps others can benefit from your unique perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest

Related Posts

How the Rise of ‘Dry Promotions’ Gives Small Business Owners Big Opportunities

How the Rise of ‘Dry Promotions’ Gives Small Business Owners Big Opportunities Remember the iconic scene in the 1980 comedy “Caddyshack” when Bill Murray’s character – Carl Spackler – reminisces about caddying for the Dalai Lama and not getting paid for his extra effort? “And I say, ‘Hey, Lama, how about a little something, you know, for the effort?’ And he says, ‘Oh, there won’t be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness. ‘ So I’ve got that going for me … which is nice.” It’s a funny exchange and of course, the punchline is that Murray’s character isn’t monetarily rewarded for his hard work but he thinks the empty promise is more valuable. Now, imagine this. You work for a company. You put in the hours and effort and you’re finally given a chance to be promoted. Then, your boss invites you into his office. Before you know it, he’s offering you a bump in your title, which comes with more responsibilities. But, he goes on to explain there won’t be any raise in pay or benefits. You’ll be paid the same amount and receive the same benefits. You’re just getting a new title that comes with a lot more work. Meet the “dry promotion.” Recent findings indicate that this practice is increasingly common as businesses grapple with financial constraints. According to a survey conducted by compensation expert Pearl Meyer, the percentage of employers choosing to bestow new job titles as a form of reward, rather than monetary compensation, has risen from 8% in 2018 to 13%, as reported by The Wall Street Journal. The Rise of the ‘Dry Promotion’ “Dry promotions” are on the rise for several reasons. One is that companies are looking to control costs and are using promotions without salary increases as a way to reward and retain employees without increasing payroll expenses. This is especially relevant in the current economic climate where businesses are facing cost pressures. Another reason is that some employees may view a promotion, even without a raise, as an opportunity to gain new skills and responsibilities that can enhance their future earnings potential. In this sense, a dry promotion can be seen as an investment in their long-term career growth. However, there are also potential downsides to dry promotions. They can lead to employee dissatisfaction if the additional responsibilities are not accompanied by a corresponding increase in compensation. This can result in retention issues if employees feel undervalued or underpaid. So while dry promotions may be a cost-effective way for companies to reward and retain employees, they need to be managed carefully to ensure they do not have unintended negative consequences. How Small Businesses Can Benefit from Dry Promotions Think about that last point for a moment. Dry promotions require employees to take on more work without being compensated. As a result, employees might feel undervalued and resentful if they’re expected to take on more responsibility without any additional pay. If companies aren’t careful, they might end up losing talented employees who decide to take their skills elsewhere in search of a better paycheck. So, while dry promotions might seem like a win-win situation on the surface, there’s a lot more to consider. It’s a delicate balancing act for companies to keep their employees happy and their bottom lines healthy. So, this also presents an opportunity for small businesses. Small organizations can benefit from larger companies offering dry promotions in several ways: Access to skilled workers. Larger companies often attract top talent due to their brand recognition, resources, and career development opportunities. When these companies offer dry promotions, it means they are giving employees more responsibilities and titles without a corresponding pay increase. This can lead to dissatisfaction among the promoted employees, making them more likely to seek new opportunities elsewhere. Small businesses can then attract these skilled workers by offering competitive salaries, a better work-life balance, or a more supportive work environment. Cost-effective hiring. Hiring new employees can be a costly process for small businesses, as they need to invest in recruitment, training, and onboarding. By attracting employees from larger companies who have received dry promotions, small businesses can reduce these costs. These employees come with experience, skills, and training, which can be a significant advantage for small businesses looking to grow. Increased employee retention. Small businesses can use the opportunity to offer better compensation and benefits packages to the skilled workers they attract from larger companies. This can help increase employee satisfaction and retention, reducing the costs associated with employee turnover. Enhanced company reputation. When small businesses successfully attract skilled workers from larger companies, it can enhance their reputation and attract more customers, clients, and investors. This can lead to increased revenue and growth opportunities for the small business. In addition, small businesses can gain the advantages of improved innovation and competitiveness. Skilled workers from larger companies often bring fresh ideas, industry knowledge, and a diverse set of skills. By integrating these employees into their workforce, small businesses can improve their innovation and competitiveness in the market. Want to Accomplish More? Do you want your company to grow faster and earn more while you spend more time with your family doing all the things you started your business to do? We can make that dream a reality. Give us 30 minutes and we will show you how to get your life back. Skeptical? Good! Put us to the test. You can call us for your free appointment at (602) 541-1760, or, if you prefer,

Read More »

Pros and Cons of Work-Share Programs

In times of uncertainty, particularly when there’s a financial crisis, work-share programs can serve as a temporary solution. But, these systems are not perfect. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean you should outright dismiss the option. Read on to learn more about the pros and cons of work-share programs. Biggest Downsides of Work-Shares As the nearby quote explains, work-share programs are offered by local governments to help small businesses in times of need. They give businesses the ability to reduce employee hours without having to resort to letting them go. As you might imagine, work-shares have their pros and cons. And, the first downside is that your business (or employees) might not qualify. If it does, another downside is that it could be more lucrative for team members to find alternative employment. Work-share programs let businesses temporarily reduce the hours of their employees, instead of laying them off during economic downturns. Technically referred to as short time compensation, the goal of work-sharing programs is to reduce unemployment. Work-sharing should not be confused with job sharing, which allows two part-time employees to share one full-time job. Instead, work-sharing allows a full-time worker’s hours to be reduced, in lieu of laying off the worker. —National Conference of State Legislatures Of course, if there’s an outright unemployment option that effectively supplies comparable or more compensation, that’s another downside. Then, there’s the matter of timing. Meaning, how long you’ll need the assistance and whether or not it’s sufficient to carry you and your employees through. Top Advantages of Work-Shares Now, there are obviously good things that come with work-share programs. These can be a real lifeline when you and your business needs it most. Here are some of the largest benefits of work-share programs: You can avoid layoffs. Okay, the most obvious advantage is the fact that you don’t have to resort to firing team members from your company. Work-share programs help you to keep your employees on the payroll, even if it’s a smaller one. It provides ongoing continuity. Another benefit is that your business can essentially carry on as usual (or as good as possible) for at least a short period of time. That can really help to save your business’ operations and keep productivity going. The arrangement helps maintain morale. Yet another upside to a work-share program is it helps to keep morale up since you’re keeping people employed and in a familiar work environment — even if it’s temporarily in another setting. You don’t have to start over again when it’s over. When the time comes to resume normal operations, the ability to retain employees helps you avoid having to hire all new staff and start over by training from scratch. What other pros and cons would you add to the list? Please comment and share your thoughts and experiences! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Read More »