Business Education

4 Big Problems with a WFH and On-Site Hybrid Business Operation

With the roll-backs of local, state, and federal COVID-19 restrictions, businesses are attempting to return to a state of normalcy. But, reinstating pre-pandemic conditions isn’t as simple as they ought to be, and too many entrepreneurs are experiencing such a cruel reality. So, some are experimenting with a hybrid solution: a combination of work-from-home or WFH and on-site business operation. Sure, it certainly sounds like a logical solution. But, every solution breeds new problems. Meaning, there are distinct disadvantages to adopting a WFH and on-site business model.

Biggest Hybrid Workplace Advantages

Obviously, corporations around the world wouldn’t put a hybrid model in-place unless it had substantial benefits. And, there are some compelling reasons, like the potential of increased productivity via a customizable schedule. After all, happy employees are more productive and that’s certainly good for the bottom line. Then, there’s the morale boost which comes from being able to choose from WFH and on-site. Employees cherish the freedom and that too, helps to boost both productivity and morale.

What many companies are converging on is a mixture of remote working and traditional office working, known as the hybrid workplace. A hybrid workplace exists when a business allows their employees to work either remotely or from the office. In a typical hybrid workplace, employees have the choice of working in a central office, working from home, or splitting their time between the two. —WeWork Ideas Blog

Additionally, it can help to reduce operating costs, which decrease with the lessened need of supporting individuals constantly on-site. Moreover, it allows employees to avoid toxic situations. For instance, two or more employees who don’t get along very well in-person can find relief by not having to be in close proximity.

4 Issues with a WFH and On-Site Hybrid Business Operation

While a hybrid operation might sound like a perfect answer, that just isn’t the case. Unfortunately, there are big potential problems with adopting a hybrid model, as the following issues might present:

Managing a hybrid team is very difficult. Anyone with experience in managing a team is familiar with the vast time and effort that goes into making it work. Now, add-in a bunch of other variables that weren’t present before and it’s easy to imagine just how more difficult or nightmarish managing people in totally different physical locations is in reality.
Some WFH employees will take advantage. Put this problem in the all-too-obvious column: some employees will exploit the new policies to their own personal advantage, even if it results in harming others and/or the company. While it’s not something you might relish thinking about, it is most definitely a possibility or perhaps, even a probability.
A hybrid scenario can easily foster resentment. Another potential problem is along the same lines as the one above — that one or more employees will gain a sense of others’ nefarious behaviors regarding the hybrid operation. That could very well cause resentment to rear its ugly head.
Not everyone will contribute the same amount. Expounding on the last two possible issues, is the real possibility one or more employees will shuffle responsibilities off their own shoulders and onto their coworkers through a form of sleight of hand.

What other suggestions do you have to deal with potential work-from-home issues? Please take a few minutes to share your thoughts and experiences. Perhaps others can benefit from your unique perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

Like this article?

Entrepreneurs, It’s Time to Ask, “Is Technology Helping or Holding You Back?”

February 6, 2025 No Comments

In 1944 during World War II, two US submarines, the USS Robalo and the USS Flyer, went down in the South China Sea.

Want More Sales? Simple. Create a Problem, then Solve It.

October 22, 2021 No Comments

One impressive attribute to Apple’s incredible success is solving problems. More particularly, “creating” a problem and then offering an attractive solution. Distilled down, this is the art of identifying a common issue or need, and then supplying a fix or a fill for said need. Steve Jobs was a master of this strategy. Prior to the introduction of the iPod, consumers simply didn’t realize they had a need for an entertainment device that could store thousands of songs. The story goes like this. Steve Jobs was out for a run when he experienced problems with his MP3 device. This led to inspiration, which he realized that if consumers were given a far superior — albeit much more expensive alternative — they would leap at the chance to buy it. Of course, history shows that Steve Jobs’ instinct was spot on. Another epiphany struck him again and Jobs responded, ordering his company to get to work on a new state-of-the-art device. This, because he feared that competitors would take his successful iPod and integrate it into a multi-functional phone. Of course, this is the birth of the iPhone. Perceived Necessity is also a Mother of Invention The business lesson that people can take from these instances is that there are always consumer needs. Even if they are somewhat obscure, they still exist and are waiting to be filled. Both of these electronic devices prove that there was indeed consumer desire for such things, even if the public didn’t yet know they wanted them. …when developing new products, processes, or even businesses, most companies aren’t sufficiently rigorous in defining the problems they’re attempting to solve and articulating why those issues are important. Without that rigor, organizations miss opportunities, waste resources, and end up pursuing innovation initiatives that aren’t aligned with their strategies. —Harvard Business Review Both products became huge sales successes, as everyone now knows. But at the time, they were a gamble. After all, these were largely luxury items and did not completely match a fundamental, utilitarian purpose. However, their form factor and marketing made them irresistible to consumers and that’s why they’ve gone down in history as two of the most remarkable innovations of their era. How to Identify a Problem to Solve and Sell Although it might seem like too big a feat to pull off, you can take a page from the same playbook. (This is especially true if you’ve been in business for many years, but even that amount of experience isn’t necessary.) The point is that there’s always a need for some type of improvement, innovation, or invention. The question really comes down to necessity and appeal. Here are a few suggestions for how to identify a common problem to solve and sell its solution: Identify a problem or need. Let’s begin with the super obvious — the need to hone in on a need or an issue that can be filled or fixed. If you’ve been working in your industry for some time now, this might even be a common gripe of yours. Think about some type of flaw or problem and that should get you started. Structure an attractive solution. Once you’ve identified a need or problem, it’s time to come up with a workable solution. Of course, this is a lot easier said than done, but the time and effort could be worthwhile in the end. Keep in mind that there are certain elements that can really help your solution sell. For instance, being appealing, convenient, cost-effective, and applicable to a wide enough consumer base to make it valuable to the public. (Or, even to others inside of your own industry.) Test out your new product or service. After you’ve come up with a methodology or product, it’s time to test it out. You should experiment in at least a few different settings, with various scenarios applied to the test environment. This will help reveal any shortcomings and will also provide inspiration as you see it in action. Testing will also help you determine its overall viability in the marketplace. What other suggestions do you have for identifying a want, need, or issue and coming up with the right fulfillment or fix? Please take a moment to share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your unique perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

So, You and Your Business Partner always Agree – Why that’s Really Bad News

September 14, 2018 No Comments

“If two people in a relationship are the same, one of them is unnecessary.” You’ve probably heard this worded in one way or another. And, it does demonstrate a very good point. Often most attributable to romantic relationships, it’s just as true for business partnerships. After all, opposites attract and we’ve seen successful pairs throughout history. Take for instance Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. One, a marketing genius. The other, a hardware guru. And, completely different personalities. Winston Churchill and General Bernard Montgomery are another unlikely pair. But together, an unstoppable force. So, why is that? Why Business Partnerships are so Difficult The truth of the matter is, the business world is a tough environment. Partnerships supposedly make it easier. But, there’s the notorious five D’s of partnerships: death, disability, disinterest, drugs, and divorce. Each one alone can split up a business partnership. Successful startups often have partners who have different strengths. One person might be the technical genius, while the other takes what they do and sells it to the masses. Having two personalities allows each individual to grow. If you can’t be challenged by a partner, you probably shouldn’t be in business at all. —Fast Company.com Why do business partnerships fail so often? It could well be one of the five D’s. Then again, it could also be the two are too much alike. That takes us right back to the notion that if two people are the same, one of them isn’t necessary. Why Your Business Partner should be Your Polar Opposite Now, let’s take a quick look at why your business partner should actually be your polar opposite. Sure, it seems counterproductive and most certainly feels counterintuitive. But, there are the following advantages: It brings strengths to the surface. A business partner who is your opposite will more clearly define your weaknesses. Hence, reveal your strengths, in the process. By the way, that’s a two-way street and the same will benefit your partner. Ultimately, making it a win-win scenario. It allows both of you to learn and grow. When your business partner is the opposite, you’ll begin to see things from a different perspective, over time. That’s also a good thing because both of you will learn from one another and grow as a result. It creates a more dynamic environment. Friction is a difficult phenomenon but it is very productive at the same time. Being challenged gives rise to a number of positives — a dynamic environment is just one example. It allows you to leverage your differences. Your differences can also be a real source of inspiration and productivity. Use your differences strategically and you’ll find them advantageous in more ways than one. What other advantages are there to having such opposites? Have you found working with someone who is totally different is more beneficial? Please share your thoughts and experiences! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.