How to Support an Employee Going through a Crisis

There’s an internet meme going around that makes a profound point, “Hire based on attitude, not skills — because you can always teach skills.” And, it backs up some very interesting statistics. For instance, did you know that 85% of a company’s success is due to the team’s attitude, and only 15% is due to individual skills? That’s why when businesses are looking to hire new employees, they should focus on finding individuals with the right attitude, not just those who have the perfect skill set. So, let’s expound a bit as to why. Attitude vs. Skill When it comes to hiring new employees, many businesses focus on finding candidates with the appropriate skills for the job. However, in order to create a successful and productive team, it’s important to also consider attitude. A positive attitude is essential for maintaining a positive work environment and achieving company goals. Is it better to have someone in a team lead role who has a strong work ethic and is all-around positive and can learn the skills or is it better to hire someone based on skills only? What is most important — the skill set or the attitude and growth potential? It depends on the job. There are some jobs where it might make sense to hire for attitude and teach the work itself when it won’t require a major investment of time to do so. There are other jobs where experience and a pre-existing skill set are essential. —Inc.com Therefore, businesses should focus on hiring people who have the right attitude, even if they may not have all the necessary skills. With the right attitude in place, employees can be taught the required skills over time. This makes sense, especially when looking at first-time job seekers in entry-level positions. Those individuals often have little to no skills at all. Those are taught through direct instruction and experience. The Advantages of Hiring Based on Attitude Rather than Skills There is no question that skills are a critical component of any employee’s toolkit. However, research has shown that an individual’s attitude is a stronger predictor of success than their skills. In order to capitalize on this, businesses should consider hiring based on attitude rather than skills due to the following reasons: Longevity. Hiring based on attitude will help you find candidates who are motivated and passionate about their work. These are the employees who will go above and beyond for your company. They will be more engaged in their work, and they will be less likely to leave their positions. Synergy. Hiring based on attitude will help you find candidates who are a good fit for your company culture. This is extremely important, as it can save you time and money in the long run. If a candidate is not a good fit for your company culture, they will likely be unhappy and unproductive in their position. Flexibility. Hiring based on attitude will help you find candidates who are able to adapt to change. When a company hires based on skillset, they may hire someone who has very specific knowledge and experience in their field. But this person might not be able to adapt when things change in the future. What other benefits are gained by hiring based on attitude instead of on skillset? Please take a moment to comment and share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

A hybrid workplace is one that employs a combination of traditional office workers and remote employees. This setup has become more popular in recent years as technology has made it easier for people to work from home. While there are many benefits to this arrangement, there are also some challenges that must be faced in order to make it work long-term. In this blog post, we will discuss three of the most common challenges: employee work time, fewer team interactions, and time-sensitive deadlines. Hybrid vs Traditional Workplaces Traditional workplaces existed for many decades before the introduction of hybrids, which of course, became ubiquitous during the pandemic shutdown. At that time, businesses hurriedly transitioned from tradition to hybrid. Of course, this triggered a learning curb. And, some businesses experienced mostly smooth sailing. But, others struggled to make it work. Regardless of how it started, what’s unfolding or about to happen unleashes some unintended consequences. One thing is clear about the future of work: At least in the near term — and possibly for much longer — hybrid work arrangements are going to be the norm for many organizations, in industries ranging from tech to pharmaceuticals to academia. There are good reasons why many companies and employees are excited about this mix of in-person and remote work — and equally good reasons why many feel trepidation about the shift. —Harvard Business Review Businesses always face challenges. From small to large, there’s no end to obstacles and issues. Going hybrid will solve some of those problems. Still, the transition and new normal will also breed new challenges. Fortunately, there are ways to cope and deal with those obstacles. 3 Long-Term Hybrid Workplace Challenges The great thing about a hybrid workplace is that it offers flexibility, freedom, and lessens commute woes and expenses. But, it does create unique challenges that weren’t likely present before its establishment. So, if your business is transitioning into a hybrid workplace or it’s already been implemented, here are three of the most common challenges facing hybrid companies: Employee work time. One of the biggest challenges faced by companies with a hybrid workplace is ensuring that employees are working the same number of hours. This can be difficult to do when some employees are in the office and others are remote. It can also be difficult to track employee time when they are working from home. In order to overcome this problem, managers need to have clear expectations about when their employees should be available for meetings or assignments and how long they are expected to work each day. This might include having regular check-ins with remote staff during normal business hours so everyone knows what is expected of them. Fewer employee team interactions. Another challenge faced by companies that have a hybrid workplace is that there are fewer opportunities for employees to interact with one another. For example, when people work from home they may not have as much time to talk about their day over lunch or exchange ideas in person during meetings. This can lead to feelings of isolation among employees which is never good for productivity levels. In order to overcome this challenge, companies need to find ways for employees to interact with one another even when they are not in the office. This might include using video conferencing tools or having regular team-building activities. Time-sensitive deadlines. A final challenge faced by companies with a hybrid workplace is that remote employees can sometimes have trouble meeting time-sensitive deadlines. For example, if someone is sick or has an unexpected emergency that requires them to be away from work for a few days then this could mean missing out on important projects which could lead to loss of revenue and customers. In order to avoid this problem, managers need to make sure they are clear about expectations when it comes down to deadlines so that employees know what needs to be done by when. This might include having regular check-ins with remote staff during normal business hours so everyone knows what is expected of them and how long they are expected to work each day. What other common challenges do hybrid workplaces face? Please take a few moments to share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your input. Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.

The use of automation in small business is becoming more and more popular. We all know that machines can do things faster and better than humans, but what about when it comes to replacing them altogether? In this blog post, we will discuss the pros and cons of using automation in your small business. The Automation Conundrum Automation can help businesses run more efficiently by replacing manual labor with machines. This can lead to increased productivity and lower costs. However, there are also some disadvantages to using automation in a small business. For example, automated systems can be unreliable and may need maintenance or repairs that can be costly and time-consuming. There is a growing need for business leaders to seek innovative ways to increase the output of their workers in order to retain their competitive positioning. Deciding to automate your workplace, partially or fully, is an important decision that needs to be made after carefully considering the pros and cons. —Businessing Magazine Additionally, if not used correctly, automation can actually decrease productivity by replacing skilled workers with machines that do not have the same level of expertise. In conclusion, it is important to weigh the pros and cons of using automation in your specific business before making a decision about whether or not to incorporate automation or even replace human employees. Business Automation Advantages and Disadvantages Of course, there are always upsides and downsides to making such changes in any size company. So, let’s take a look at the biggest advantages of using automation in a small business: Increased efficiency and productivity: Automation can help small businesses to run more efficiently and produce more output with fewer inputs. This can lead to increased profits and competitiveness. Reduced costs: Automated systems often require less maintenance than human workers, leading to reduced costs over time. Reduced risk of error: Automated systems are far less likely to make mistakes than human workers, leading to improved accuracy and reliability. Although these reasons definitely make it seem like a smart move and bode well for streamlining with technology. There are distinct disadvantages of using automation in a small business, like the following: Lack of flexibility: Automated systems are not able to easily adapt to changing circumstances the way that humans can. You might be faced with expensive and tedious reprogramming. Extra expenses: Can be expensive to set up and maintain automated systems. Machines break down and this alone could lead to substantial out-of-pocket costs. Overall efficiency: Automated systems may be less efficient than human workers in certain tasks. What other pros and cons would you include in regard to introducing automation in a small business? Please share your thoughts and experiences so others can benefit from your perspective! Interested in learning more about business? Then just visit Waters Business Consulting Group.